On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 7:47:56 AM, Allister wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: message dispatcher
A Perhaps a little too paranoid in some eyes, but each to their own. But
A think about how much this capability alone could attract users if they
A could use at least the basic features
Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 1:41:36 AM, Mary wrote (amongst other stuff):
MB I got The Bat! for its safety. Retired, with plenty of time, and
MB somewhat paranoid, I look at each message separately on the Dispatcher
MB and decide there whether to delete or download.
Perhaps a little too paranoid in
Dear list,
Mary said:
MB Among my first complaints here, during the evaluation
MB phase of my acquaintance with The Bat!, was that I
MB could not understand the Help file. It will tell you
MB what something does--ocasionally in words that mean
MB something to a newcomer--but it never tells you
MB
Hello Eric!
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 6:11 AM, you wrote:
MB ... it [The Bat!'s Help File] never tells you *where* to find
MB anything or *how* to use it in a way that the steps are easily
MB followed.
MB So, this list and the other TB! lists, plus tbot--those are your
MB Help file.
E Which
Monday, July 12, 2004, 11:03:30 PM, Mary wrote:
MB Hmm. I've been joking about the time machine :timemachine: but I
MB wonder. Could our mails be lost in here: :tm:
A job is never finished until the paperwork is done. :-D
--
Regards,
Plan9 :plan9:
Two strings walk into a bar. The first
Hello Mary,
Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 2:17:32 PM, you wrote:
MB I had to ask Google to take me here, in order to understand that
MB acronym:
So an acronym dictionary is needed, as in 40tude Dialog. When reading a
message the acronym appears underlined and hovering over it brings up a comment
Hello Mike,
When reading a message the acronym appears underlined and hovering
over it brings up a comment showing the meaning stored.
The e-mail client I used for 7 years before changing to TB had that
feature. Very useful indeed.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Hello Allister!
On Monday, July 12, 2004, 12:34 AM, you wrote:
MB In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help file would soon be
MB obsolete. I consider that I am running an obsolete version, and I have
MB the latest Full
Hallo Allister,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:34:35 +1200GMT (12-7-2004, 7:34 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AJ Monday, July 12, 2004, 12:06:58 PM, Mary wrote (amongst other stuff):
MB In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help
Hallo Roelof,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:29:30 +0200GMT (12-7-2004, 17:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:34:35 +1200GMT (12-7-2004, 7:34 +0200, where I
RO live), you wrote:
It surprised me somewhat that this piece of shit didn't appear any
sooner on this list.
I wanted
Hello Roelof!
On Monday, July 12, 2004, 6:39 PM, you wrote:
RO It surprised me somewhat that this piece of [see h2g2 for
RO translation] didn't appear any sooner on this list.
I think I may have been the only one to notice. :) And I forgave you
immediately, for the sake of your budgies and
Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:39:52 PM, Roelof wrote:
RO The weirdest thing however, is that my real reply, composed an hour
RO later was distributed within a few minutes, while my inadvertent (is
RO that the correct word) reply took over seven hours to get back to me.
For me weird things have been
Hi Plan9
-
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, at 22:54:04 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:54 PM where
I live) you wrote:
Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:39:52 PM, Roelof wrote:
snip
For me weird things have been happening all day as far a e-mail is
concerned. I have been
Hello Plan9!
On Monday, July 12, 2004, 9:54 PM, you wrote:
P Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:39:52 PM, Roelof wrote:
RO The weirdest thing however, is that my real reply, composed an hour
RO later was distributed within a few minutes, while my inadvertent (is
RO that the correct word) reply took over
On Monday, July 12, 2004 @ 1:34:35 PM, Allister Jenks wrote:
[snips]
MB In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help file would soon be
MB obsolete. I consider that I am running an obsolete version, and I have
MB the latest
Hello Jimmie!
On Sunday, July 11, 2004, 1:32 PM, you wrote:
JT Some instruction would be nice not just for Bayeslt but the entire program.
You are not alone. Among my first complaints here, during the
evaluation phase of my acquaintance with The Bat!, was that I could
not understand the Help
Monday, July 12, 2004, 12:06:58 PM, Mary wrote (amongst other stuff):
MB In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help file would soon be
MB obsolete. I consider that I am running an obsolete version, and I have
MB the latest
17 matches
Mail list logo