Re: The Bat! version signature

2014-01-26 Thread MFPA
Hi On Sunday 26 January 2014 at 10:44:22 PM, in , Jernej Simoncic wrote: > You can read the rationale here: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dn302074(v=vs.85).aspx > Thanks. It half made sense to me. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu

Re: The Bat! version signature

2014-01-26 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Sunday, January 26, 2014, 23:14:12, MFPA wrote: > How/why is that a good plan? You can read the rationale here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dn302074(v=vs.85).aspx -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > If there is a wrong thing to say, one w

Re: The Bat! version signature

2014-01-26 Thread MFPA
Hi On Saturday 25 January 2014 at 2:40:11 PM, in , Jernej Simoncic wrote: > The plan going forward is that programs > won't be able to check if they're running on a newer > Windows version than the highest one they're marked as > being compatible with How/why is that a good plan? -- Best r

Re: The Bat! version signature

2014-01-25 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Saturday, January 25, 2014, 14:50:31, Rick wrote: > I updated my template, yet it shows 9200 Like I said, Windows 8.1 pretends to be Windows 8 unless the program is marked as being 8.1-compatible in it's manifest. The plan going forward is that programs won't be able to check if they're runnin

Re: The Bat! version signature

2014-01-25 Thread Rick
JS> On Saturday, January 25, 2014, 3:22:29, Rick wrote: >> That is the internal build number for 8.1 - it is in my sig too JS> It's not - 6.2 build 9200 is Windows 8, while 8.1 is 6.3 build 9600. I updated my template, yet it shows 9200 -- Rick The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives

Re: The Bat! version signature

2014-01-25 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Saturday, January 25, 2014, 3:22:29, Rick wrote: > That is the internal build number for 8.1 - it is in my sig too It's not - 6.2 build 9200 is Windows 8, while 8.1 is 6.3 build 9600. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > He that lives upon Hope dies farting. -

Re: The Bat! version signature

2014-01-24 Thread Cafe Noir
Hello Rick, Friday, January 24, 2014, 6:22:29 PM, you wrote: CN>> Hello Tbudl, CN>> I just got a new Windows 8 computer, updated it to version 8.1 The CN>> Bat! signature says Windows 6.2 Build 9200. Anyone know why this is? CN>> Karla > That is the internal build number for 8.1 - it

Re: The Bat! version signature

2014-01-24 Thread Rick
CN> Hello Tbudl, CN> I just got a new Windows 8 computer, updated it to version 8.1 The CN> Bat! signature says Windows 6.2 Build 9200. Anyone know why this is? CN> Karla That is the internal build number for 8.1 - it is in my sig too -- Rick The great religions are the ships, Poets t

Re: The Bat! version signature

2014-01-24 Thread Cafe Noir
Hello Jernej, Friday, January 24, 2014, 3:42:03 PM, you wrote: > On Saturday, January 25, 2014, 0:13:57, Cafe Noir wrote: >> I just got a new Windows 8 computer, updated it to version 8.1 The >> Bat! signature says Windows 6.2 Build 9200. Anyone know why this is? > Windows 8.1 pretends t

Re: The Bat! version signature

2014-01-24 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Saturday, January 25, 2014, 0:13:57, Cafe Noir wrote: > I just got a new Windows 8 computer, updated it to version 8.1 The > Bat! signature says Windows 6.2 Build 9200. Anyone know why this is? Windows 8.1 pretends to be Windows 8 unless the program is specifically marked as Windows 8.1

The Bat! version signature

2014-01-24 Thread Cafe Noir
Hello Tbudl, I just got a new Windows 8 computer, updated it to version 8.1 The Bat! signature says Windows 6.2 Build 9200. Anyone know why this is? Karla -- Best regards, Cafe Noir mailto:cafe.n...@mail.ru Secure Email Natural Healt