Hi
On Friday 17 April 2009 at 8:46:26 PM, in
, tracer wrote:
> I hate hotmail and incredimail!!!
I'm with you on hating incredimail but why hotmail?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
When you're through changing, you're through
Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 B
Hi
On Friday 17 April 2009 at 8:42:56 PM, in
, Marck D Pearlstone
wrote:
> Not a matter of them complaining. It's about the state
> of the reply I get back.
I see.
> Also, they often miss things I
> interject with, seeing only the first line of text I
> type.
(-;
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hello MFPA
Saturday, April 18, 2009, 2:33:11 AM, you wrote:
M> Hi
M> On Wednesday 15 April 2009 at 2:47:08 PM, in
M> , Marck D Pearlstone
M> wrote:
>> I have many friends
>> who write to me from their Hotmail accounts (shudder)
>> or using Incredimail. It's pointless trying to inline a
>> rep
Dear Mfpa,
@17-Apr-2009, 20:33 MFPA [M] in
mid:1517333142.20090417203...@my_localhost said to Marck:
...
>> (shudder) or using Incredimail. It's pointless trying to inline a
>> reply to them.
M> Why is that? Nobody complains when I do it.
Not a matter of them complaining. It's about the state
Hi
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 at 2:47:08 PM, in
, Marck D Pearlstone
wrote:
> I have many friends
> who write to me from their Hotmail accounts (shudder)
> or using Incredimail. It's pointless trying to inline a
> reply to them.
Why is that? Nobody complains when I do it.
--
Best regards,
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:01:54 +0100 GMT (15/Apr/09, 23:01 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> Why so complicated?
MDP> Because I am a power crazed technophile with a penchant for full
MDP> automation.
At least you're honest. ;-)
MDP> The QT's are the same ones I use for stan
Dear Thomas,
@15-Apr-2009, 22:38 +0700 (15-Apr 16:38 here) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in
mid:969244542.20090415223...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de said to Marck:
...
MDP>> I use a macro called tr - I type "tr" and tb re-starts the
MDP>> reply on-the-fly to be ready for a top posted response.
MDP>> ,--/
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:43:42 +0100 GMT (15/Apr/09, 16:43 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
ND>> As for keeping the whole message in tact, can anyone suggest a way
ND>> that a macro might be able to effectively turn my "reply quoting
ND>> selected text" into a regular F5 Reply?
M
Hello Marck D Pearlstone
Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 8:47:08 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Nick,
MDP> @15-Apr-2009, 14:36 Nick Dutton [ND] in
MDP> mid:297927601.20090415143...@winchmore.com said to Marck:
MDP> ...
MDP>>> For the first two, I vastly prefer inline posting.
MDP> ...
ND>> Indeed, an
Hello Marck D Pearlstone
Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 8:15:02 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear 0tracer,
MDP> @15-Apr-2009, 20:08 +0700 (15-Apr 14:08 here) tracer [0] in
MDP> mid:519688111.20090415200...@gmail.com said:
MDP> ...
ND>>> Wow - let me have a look at this later on when I get some time...
ND
Dear Nick,
@15-Apr-2009, 14:36 Nick Dutton [ND] in
mid:297927601.20090415143...@winchmore.com said to Marck:
...
MDP>> For the first two, I vastly prefer inline posting.
...
ND> Indeed, and the only thing worse than a long top-posted thread is a
ND> bottom-post fanatic making it even more dif
Hello Marck,
On Wednesday, April 15, 2009, you wrote:
MDP> Rules for mailing lists are one thing. Personal preferences are
MDP> another. Requirements of business email threads, usually in
MDP> communications with Outlook and OE users are yet another.
MDP> For the first two, I vastly prefer inline
Dear 0tracer,
@15-Apr-2009, 20:08 +0700 (15-Apr 14:08 here) tracer [0] in
mid:519688111.20090415200...@gmail.com said:
...
ND>> Wow - let me have a look at this later on when I get some time...
ND>> ...looks promising though.
ND>> Thanks.
0> Donot forget its from the member telling us in the
Hello Nick Dutton
Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 5:14:48 PM, you wrote:
ND> Hello Marck,
ND> On Wednesday, April 15, 2009, you wrote:
MDP>> Does that help?
ND> Wow - let me have a look at this later on when I get some time...
ND> ...looks promising though.
ND> Thanks.
Donot forget its from the
Hello Marck,
On Wednesday, April 15, 2009, you wrote:
MDP> Does that help?
Wow - let me have a look at this later on when I get some time...
...looks promising though.
Thanks.
--
Nick | n...@winchmore.com
Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using
Dear Nick,
@15-Apr-2009, 10:29 Nick Dutton [ND] in
mid:162582448.20090415102...@winchmore.com said to tbudl:
...
ND> As for keeping the whole message in tact, can anyone suggest a way
ND> that a macro might be able to effectively turn my "reply quoting
ND> selected text" into a regular F5 Reply?
Hello,
I have a few people who *really* don't like the way that I "corrupt"
e-mails by quoting extracts in my reply!
Yes, they are all Outlook users, who also think that bottom posting is
evil.
I'm not going to be able to change this, and have fixed the tip/bottom
posting in the users' reply tem
17 matches
Mail list logo
