Monday, September 8, 2003, 8:20:12 PM, you wrote:
JM>> The message copies/moves just fine, but the count doesn't change, etc.
> I'll trade that for the bug that keeps the account mailbox from
> updating when new mail arrives. Since I have no faith it the counters
> anymore I'm compelled to manual
Monday, September 8, 2003, 5:43:21 PM, you wrote:
> Jack Morrison, [JM] wrote:
JM>> When copying or moving a message from one folder to another,
JM>> sometimes the message *count* in the receiving folder doesn't change
JM>> until after you close and then re-open TB.
> I see this as well. However
Allie,
AM> Jack Morrison, [JM] wrote:
JM>> When copying or moving a message from one folder to another,
JM>> sometimes the message *count* in the receiving folder doesn't change
JM>> until after you close and then re-open TB.
AM> I see this as well. However, simply selecting the folder updates t
Jack Morrison, [JM] wrote:
JM> When copying or moving a message from one folder to another,
JM> sometimes the message *count* in the receiving folder doesn't change
JM> until after you close and then re-open TB.
I see this as well. However, simply selecting the folder updates the
count here.
--
Monday, September 8, 2003, 1:43:25 PM, you wrote:
>I have yet to see any bugs in v2.0 after
> using it extensively since the full release.
I think I just found one.
When copying or moving a message from one folder to another, sometimes
the message *count* in the receiving folder doesn't change u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello David,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, at 19:28:44 [GMT +0100]
(which was 08/09/2003 (D/M/Y) 20:28 where I live) you wrote:
DB> I suspect you're seeing a disproportionate number of bug messages.
It doesn't really matter, but a new version a
On Monday, September 8, 2003, David Boggon wrote:
> on 8/9/03 you wrote:
>> The release of v2 seems premature. Should the name be changed to
>> The Bug?
> I suspect you're seeing a disproportionate number of bug messages.
I would agree with that. I have yet to see any bugs in v2.0 after
using
Hi Joan,
on 8/9/03 you wrote:
JJ> The release of v2 seems premature. Should the name be changed to
JJ> The Bug?
I suspect you're seeing a disproportionate number of bug messages.
The upgrade functionality has not really impacted on my usage of the
bat to justify the upgrade cost, howeve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi batters!,
I am anxiously following the group discussions to decide if, and when, to
upgrade to v2, and two questions come to my mind:
USD 17 for this excellent soft deserve that many mails in a thread?
The release of v2 seems premat
9 matches
Mail list logo
