Hi Bat! Fans,
In some mail I receive, the URL is not showing highlighted (ie
clickable) which it was in 1.62r
For instance:-
SWEDEN IN SHOCK AFTER STABBING
SWEDEN was in a state of emotional shock after its foreign minister,
Anna Lindh, died overnight from knife injuries inflicted by an unknown
Hello John,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 20:43:32 +1000 GMT (12/09/2003, 17:43 +0700 GMT),
John Phillips wrote:
> In some mail I receive, the URL is not showing highlighted (ie
> clickable) which it was in 1.62r
> For instance:-
[...]
> Any clues at all?
No, they highlight fine here and are clickable.
12-Sep-2003 15:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> URLs don't highlight when the are in a quioted line:
> http://www.com versus
>> http://www.com
They do here, with v1.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
I think that God in creating man somewhat overestimated his ability. --
O
Hello Alexander,
>> URLs don't highlight when the are in a quioted line:
>
>> http://www.com versus
>>> http://www.com
>
> They do here, with v1.
They don't here with 1.62i
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
_
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, at 20:00:14 [GMT +0700] (which was 23:00 where I
live) you wrote:
> No, they highlight fine here and are clickable.
> URLs don't highlight when the are in a quioted line:
> http://www.com versus
>> http://www.com
> or when they are surrounded by square brackets
On Friday, September 12, 2003, 17:05:27, MAU wrote:
>> They do here, with v1.
> They don't here with 1.62i
You're both right. Rich Text Viewer makes the links clickable all the time,
while the normal viewer only underlines the links outside comment lines.
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
12-Sep-2003 17:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> http://www.com versus
http://www.com
>> They do here, with v1.
> They don't here with 1.62i
A reason for you to update to 1.62r eventually? ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
___
Hello MAU,
On 12 Sep 2003 at 17:05:27 +0200 GMT [17:05 CEST] you wrote:
>>> URLs don't highlight when the are in a quioted line:
>>
>>> http://www.com versus
http://www.com
>>
>> They do here, with v1.
M> They don't here with 1.62i
It depends on what viewer you use.
--
Cheers,
Andre
"
Hello Andre,
> It depends on what viewer you use.
You are very right. I have always used and use the FWFV and forget there
is another viewer. I guess it must be that I never felt much need for
the RTV ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
__
Hello Alexander,
> A reason for you to update to 1.62r eventually? ;-)
I need a much bigger incentive to make that huge jump ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUD
Friday, September 12, 2003, 2:00:14 PM, Thomas wrote:
TF> URLs don't highlight when the are in a quoted line:
TF> http://www.com versus
>> http://www.com
TF> or when they are surrounded by square brackets:
TF> [http://www.com]
But if they aren't clickable you can still highlight them and
Hi Anne,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, at 18:44:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 03:44 where I
live) you wrote:
> But if they aren't clickable you can still highlight them and use
> the right mouse click menu and use the Open URL option to open
> the webpage... this seems to work on all URL's however they are
>
Hello Anne,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:44:28 +0100 GMT (13/09/2003, 00:44 +0700 GMT),
Anne wrote:
TF>> [http://www.com]
> But if they aren't clickable you can still highlight them and use
> the right mouse click menu and use the Open URL option to open
> the webpage... this seems to work on all UR
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, at 06:49:34 [GMT +1000] (which was 06:49 where I
live) I wrote:
> This is painful of course.
There was a follow up to this which my anti-spam somehow managed to
dump? Can the poster please re-post? Thanks.
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on
Saturday, September 13, 2003, 1:48:43 AM, Thomas wrote:
TF> Doesn't work here on the above URL. Using PTV.
H that's strange Thomas as I only use the PTV as well and
it works just fine for me... I wonder why it doesn't for you?
Ahhh I've just thought... are you highlighting the [brackets] as
Hello Anne,
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:33:55 +0100 GMT (16/09/2003, 04:33 +0700 GMT),
Anne wrote:
TF>> Doesn't work here on the above URL. Using PTV.
> H that's strange Thomas as I only use the PTV as well and
> it works just fine for me... I wonder why it doesn't for you?
> Ahhh I've just thou
Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 2:27:08 AM, Thomas wrote:
TF> We might be talking about different things: Yes, I can copy and
TF> paste. But this is not what I am talking about. *I* don't highlight
TF> anything, TB does it for me.
I think we're talking about the same thing but in different ways
Thom
Hello Anne,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:55:46 +0100 GMT (16/09/2003, 21:55 +0700 GMT),
Anne wrote:
TF>> The second is just text and I would have to c&p it into my
TF>> browser's address field.
> Yes just text but no I don't have to copy/paste it as I said
> above - just highlighting it in TB! invokes
Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 5:11:33 PM, Thomas wrote:
TF> And why oh why, if TB does recognise it as an URL, is it not
TF> highlighted so that we can just click on it?
Now _that_ must be a question for the devs methinks Thomas...?
;-)
--
Cheers,
Anne
Flying high with The Bat! v2.00.6
Hi Thomas,
on Tue, 16 Sep 2003 23:11:33 +0700GMT (16.09.03, 18:11 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TF> And why oh why, if TB does recognise it as an URL, is it not
TF> highlighted so that we can just click on it?
TB! only recognises it as a URL when there are no square bracke
Hello Anne,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:39:06 +0100 GMT (17/09/2003, 04:39 +0700 GMT),
Anne wrote:
TF>> And why oh why, if TB does recognise it as an URL, is it not
TF>> highlighted so that we can just click on it?
> Now _that_ must be a question for the devs methinks Thomas...?
> ;-)
Yes. Bug repor
Wednesday, September 17, 2003, 5:44:04 PM, Thomas wrote:
TF> Yes. Bug report or wishlist item?
I did mention the problem of non-clickable links a while back to
which Marck replied here,
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - I wonder if
next week's changes (see Stefan's post) will resolve this? If
not, I thin
Hi Anne,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, at 04:17:28 [GMT+0100] (which was 13:17:28
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
> next week's changes (see Stefan's post)
...err, where was this?
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
It it ain'
Hello John,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:48:22 +1000 GMT (21/09/2003, 10:48 +0700 GMT),
John Phillips wrote:
>> next week's changes (see Stefan's post)
> ...err, where was this?
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
Ich bin ferner mi
Hello Anne,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:17:28 +0100 GMT (21/09/2003, 10:17 +0700 GMT),
Anne wrote:
> I wonder if next week's changes (see Stefan's post) will resolve
> this? If not, I think it's a bug.
Either that, or nobody has posted it to the BT...
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen Th
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, at 11:15:33 [GMT+0700] (which was 14:15:33
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA.
Sorry, I don't (and probably a lot of others) subscribe to that list.
Would the moderator mind if you posted it here at all?
I tried to find it in
Anne, [A] wrote:
A> I did mention the problem of non-clickable links a while back to
A> which Marck replied here,
A> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - I wonder if
A> next week's changes (see Stefan's post) will resolve this? If
A> not, I think it's a bug.
Upon reading that message, the URL is understandab
On Sun, 21 Sept 2003 04:50:21 -0500 GMT(21/09/2003, 10:50 AM
+ GMT), Allie Martin wrote:
AM> Anne, [A] wrote:
A>> I wonder if next week's changes (see Stefan's post) will
A>> resolve this?
I don't recall that post.
AM> Example:
href="http://the-bat-forums.donzeigler.com";>http://the-ba
Hello John,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:36:35 +1000 GMT (21/09/2003, 16:36 +0700 GMT),
John Phillips wrote:
>> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA.
> I tried to find it in the archives.
Unfortunately, in the archives you cannot search by message-ID. This
is the message in which Stefan raised hope for a
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, at 23:57:34 [GMT+0700] (which was Mon, 2:57:34
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
> Unfortunately, in the archives you cannot search by message-ID. This
> is the message in which Stefan raised hope for a new version coming
> out next week:
> http://www.mail-arch
Hello MAU,
Friday, September 12, 2003, 11:05:27 AM, you wrote:
M> Hello Alexander,
>>> URLs don't highlight when the are in a quioted line:
>>
>>> http://www.com versus
http://www.com
>>
>> They do here, with v1.
M> They don't here with 1.62i
They do here with 1.62r
--
mm
31 matches
Mail list logo
