Hello Miles,
Friday, April 16, 2004, 3:07:25 PM, you wrote:
MJ> One would think Ritlabs would have sent a correction with the new
MJ> date. It's as basic as it gets in term of professionalism and
MJ> after all, it should just be child's play, one or a few clicks
MJ> away for them, right?
It woul
Hello Jarle,
On Friday, April 16, 2004 at 10:25:13 +0200, you wrote:
...
> Was the e-mail a hoax?
It's released. Look at my sig.
--
Best regards,
David
** In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. - Napoleon Bonaparte **
[TB! 2.10] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4]
[Runn
MM> no, but release date was delayed, as You can see in my signature, we
MM> have Release Candidate version of 2.1.
One would think Ritlabs would have sent a correction with the new date. It's
as basic as it gets in term of professionalism and after all, it should just
be child's play, one or a f
Hello all,
Friday, April 16, 2004, Jarle H. Knudsen wrote:
> a few days ago I received an e-mail from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] stating that on April 15 version 2.1
> of The Bat! would be released. However, checking the Ritlabs website
> today, the latest version seems to be 2.04.7. Was
Hello all,
a few days ago I received an e-mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stating that on April 15 version 2.1
of The Bat! would be released. However, checking the Ritlabs website
today, the latest version seems to be 2.04.7. Was the e-mail a hoax?
Best regards,
Jarle H. Knudsen
5 matches
Mail list logo