Re: Version Numbers

2005-07-27 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Roman, On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:25:59 -0400GMT (27-7-2005, 3:25 +0200, where I live), you wrote: Is 3.51 later than 3.5.26 please? Yes. The version numbering system was changed a little bit. Quoting developer 9Val from the beta list: RK And where does 3.5.30 fit in? Between 3.5.26 and

Version Numbers

2005-07-26 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Group I have had an email telling me that version 3.51 is available. I am running 3.5.26 and I'm confused about the numbering. Is 3.51 later than 3.5.26 please? -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK :Jeff_Gaines: Using 3.5.26 Current

Re: Version Numbers

2005-07-26 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Jeff Gaines everyone else, on 26-Jul-2005 at 18:38 you (Jeff Gaines) wrote: Is 3.51 later than 3.5.26 please? Yes. The version numbering system was changed a little bit. Quoting developer 9Val from the beta list: .- | 3.51.10 | | 3 = the major version number | 51 = first cipher

Re: Version Numbers

2005-07-26 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Jeff. JG I have had an email telling me that version 3.51 is available. I am JG running 3.5.26 and I'm confused about the numbering. JG Is 3.51 later than 3.5.26 please? This is newest public release. -- WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [email only]|[3MB

Re: Version Numbers

2005-07-26 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Jeff, On Tuesday, July 26, 2005, at 12:38:35 PM, you wrote re: Version Numbers: JG I have had an email telling me that version 3.51 is available. I am JG running 3.5.26 and I'm confused about the numbering. Many of us are. There is a similar discussion occurring on the beta list. JG

Re[2]: Version Numbers

2005-07-26 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Group On Tuesday, July 26, 2005, 5:48:59 PM, Alexander wrote: ...and besides that, 51 is of course larger than 5, isn't that obvious? :-D *hehe* Maths is not my strongest subject :-) Thanks! -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK :Jeff_Gaines: Using TheBat! 3.5.26

Re: Version Numbers

2005-07-26 Thread Roman Katzer
Hi Alexander, On Tuesday, July 26, 2005, 12:48:59, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Is 3.51 later than 3.5.26 please? Yes. The version numbering system was changed a little bit. Quoting developer 9Val from the beta list: And where does 3.5.30 fit in? Roman -- We know that the nature of genius is