Hello Nick
Thank you for your email dated Thursday, March 28, 2002, 8:14:45 PM, in which you
wrote:
NA> she
She?
--
Regards
William
PGP spoken here - email me for my Public Key
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flying with The Bat! 1.60
Cu
Hello William,
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 12:26:53 PM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to "Why folder templates are dangerous (was Re: Clarification
requested on list reply headers)":
NA>> she
> She?
Absolutely! Something as refined yet temperamental as Th
Hello David,
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 04:15:54 AM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to "Why folder templates are dangerous (was Re: Clarification
requested on list reply headers)":
>> I've seen Marck's warnings about using folder templates, along wit
Thursday, March 28, 2002, 12:15:54 PM, David van Zuijlekom wrote:
> This is a quote from Marck a few months ago (a very good explanation
> why folder templates are dangerous):
---
I'm guilty of this. However, I have fifty-odd folders, most of which
I've set with custom properties and templates.
BATTERS,
Geez people! Aren't we paying attention anymore ???
When i cross a green light i still keep looking around me if
any traffic is there.
When you write email check and maybe double check what you are doing
if your mails are "sensitive". Heck, never use email for "sensitive" subjects i
mig
Hello Dave,
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002 at 17:39:28 -0500, Dave Goodman [DG]
wrote concerning 'Clarification requested on list reply headers':
...
> I've seen Marck's warnings about using folder templates, along with
> comments from several others. What I have not seen is an explanation
> why th
6 matches
Mail list logo
