Hi,
I used the e-mail provider GMX for almost a week now and must say that
I'm very satisfied. Thanks for the tip.
As I want to have the ability to send and receive large e-mails (with
attachments) I'm considering to take an GMXPro account. Can you
recommend this?. It's certainly not very
Hi Marc,
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:00:26 +0100GMT (13/12/2001, 18:00 +0800GMT),
Marc van Breemen wrote:
MvB As I want to have the ability to send and receive large e-mails (with
MvB attachments) I'm considering to take an GMXPro account. Can you
MvB recommend this?. It's certainly not very
Hi Marc,
On 13 Dec 2001 at 11:00:26 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
MvB As I want to have the ability to send and receive large e-mails
MvB (with attachments) I'm considering to take an GMXPro account. Can
MvB you recommend this?.
Does the mailbox really not satisfy your needs? You can receive mails up
Hello Thomas,
13 Dec 2001, 10:59:58, you wrote:
Hi Marc,
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:00:26 +0100GMT (13/12/2001, 18:00 +0800GMT),
Marc van Breemen wrote:
MvB As I want to have the ability to send and receive large e-mails (with
MvB attachments) I'm considering to take an GMXPro account. Can you
Hello Lars,
13 Dec 2001, 11:11:45, you wrote:
Does the mailbox really not satisfy your needs? You can receive mails up
to a size of 5 MB and send mails with up to 2 MB.
Occasionally I have attachments of aprox. 6-7 MB. Sometimes I receive
two of three of these in one day. So that's why I
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:22:10 +0100, Marc Van Breemen [MVB] wrote these
comments:
...
Does the mailbox really not satisfy your needs? You can receive
mails up to a size of 5 MB and send mails with up to 2 MB.
MVB Occasionally I have attachments of aprox. 6-7 MB. Sometimes I
MVB receive two of
Hello Allie,
13 Dec 2001, 12:44:57, you wrote:
I don't use e-mail for those types of attachments. I subscribe to a
remote server space service with FTP functionality. I upload whatever
I wish to upload and then send the recipient a link. They can then
download whenever they want. This is
@ 12:57:50 +0100 [ Thu, 13 Dec 2001], Marc Van Breemen [MVB] wrote
these words of wisdom:
...
MVB I send and receive large attachments to/from customers at work.
MVB Most of them have broadband connections, or at least fast
MVB flat-rate connections. It's not common to provide them a link.
MVB
Hello Thomas,
On 10 Dec 2001 at 05:12:17 you wrote (at least in part):
TF Note the past tense.
This was intentionally, as meanwhile software do not need this anymore
for there being other ways of mail storing that avoid this.
Nevertheless there're still some older systems, and upgrading is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On 10 Dec 2001 at 05:12:17 you wrote:
Note the past tense.
Could have been something to do with Peter not as conversant in
English than you? Phew, nice construction, ain't it.
Seriously, there are still people out there using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
9 Dec 2001 at 18:02:39 ,
Nick Andriash wrote the following
on the Yahoo slow? thread:
Not to mention that GMX prefixes the character to every line beginning
with from. :o(
Very OT: Nick... Outlook?!? LoL
I lived to see this happen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:46:02 +0100GMT (which was 09:46 +0100GMT where I live),
Peter Palmreuther thought about Yahoo slow? and wrote:
TF GMX does add the character into mails received via my pro-account. :-(
PP That's a reason to write to them
In a message dated, Mon, 10 Dec 2001 18:03:24 +0100, Peter Meyns [PM]
wrote:
...
PM that's exactly what I did two times. In their replies they denied that GMX
PM would in /any/ way alter the mails. Although I submitted copies of the same
PM message received with GMX and with my domain's account,
Hello Allie,
On 10 Dec 2001 at 19:19:38 you wrote (at least in part):
ACM They could very well be right. It could be one of the intermediate
ACM servers that is altering the message content. You could take a look at
ACM your message headers to see how many servers are involved in getting
ACM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
8 Dec 2001 at 10:13:07 ,
Marc van Breemen wrote the following
on the Yahoo slow? thread:
MvB YES!!! Finally a quick response. Bye bye Yahoo, hello
MvB GMX.NET!
:) Yep. it's fast, the only thing I do not like about their
service is the rather
PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 9, 2001 12:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Yahoo slow?
:) Yep. it's fast, the only thing I do not like about their
service is the rather complicated forwarding feature.
--
Archives : http
Hello Nick,
On 9 Dec 2001, 9:54:08, you wrote:
Not to mention that GMX prefixes the character to every line beginning
with from. :o(
What precisely do you mean? I cannot share you're experience on that point.
--
Best regards,
Marcmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hello Marc.
At 12:10 PM on Saturday, December 08, 2001 you wrote the
following on the posted subject 'Yahoo slow?':
Marc YES!!! Finally a quick response. Bye bye Yahoo, hello
Marc GMX.NET!
I don't know if you belong to any Yahoo! groups but if you
do, how does this help you
Hello Marc,
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 13:30:00 +0100 GMT (09/12/2001, 20:30 +0800 GMT),
Marc van Breemen wrote:
MvB What precisely do you mean? I cannot share you're experience on that point.
There is no , just the word from in the next line:
from
See what GMX did to it? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Hello Jan,
On 9 Dec 2001, 15:56:55, you wrote:
Hello Marc.
At 12:10 PM on Saturday, December 08, 2001 you wrote the
following on the posted subject 'Yahoo slow?':
Marc YES!!! Finally a quick response. Bye bye Yahoo, hello
Marc GMX.NET!
I don't know if you belong to any Yahoo! groups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On 9 Dec 2001 at 17:00:02 you wrote:
There is no , just the word from in the next line:
from
See what GMX did to it? ;-)
Nothing, as you can see. The point I tried to make when the discussion
came up months ago. GMX either
Hello Dierk,
On 9 Dec 2001 at 18:23:51 you wrote (at least in part):
There is no , just the word from in the next line:
from
See what GMX did to it? ;-)
DH Nothing, as you can see. The point I tried to make when the discussion
DH came up months ago. GMX either does not or not always
Hello Dierk,
9 Dec 2001, 18:23:51, you wrote:
There is no , just the word from in the next line:
from
See what GMX did to it? ;-)
Nothing, as you can see. The point I tried to make when the discussion
came up months ago. GMX either does not or not always insert the
prefix.
So it
Hi Peter,
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:52:11 +0100GMT (10/12/2001, 02:52 +0800GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
PP The '' is not a thing of let's annoy some people but there were
PP times and software that _needed_ it for secure message storing and
PP re-retrieving.
Note the past tense.
PP So if
Hi,
I'm using, as you see, Yahoo for my email. I have never any problems
with it. In the past I used Hotmail which is really s..t.
When I post a message to this list then it takes a while (an hour or
sometimes two days) to see my posting appearing in the list. Sometimes
I receive the replies
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 13:16:12 +0100, Marc Van Breemen [MVB] wrote these
comments:
...
MVB I'm using, as you see, Yahoo for my email. I have never any
MVB problems with it. In the past I used Hotmail which is really
MVB s..t.
MVB When I post a message to this list then it takes a while (an hour
ACM On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 13:16:12 +0100, Marc Van Breemen [MVB] wrote these
ACM comments:
snip
ACM MVB When I post a message to this list then it takes a while (an hour
ACM MVB or sometimes two days) to see my posting appearing in the list.
ACM MVB Sometimes I receive the replies much earlier.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marc
Thank you for your email dated Saturday, December 08, 2001, 12:16:12 PM, in which you
wrote:
MvB In that case: which do you suggest?
Try www.gmx.com - multi-language support, good security/privacy
features.
- --
Regards
William
PGP
ACM If you wish to try another, I'd suggest a gmx.net account. I've been
ACM using it without problems for some time now.
I did go to the website to sign on and give it a try, but they want to
know too much of you. I'm not willing to supply that much information.
Do you have other suggestions?
Hi Marc,
Saturday, December 08, 2001, 02:43 pm, you wrote:
MvB I did go to the website to sign on and give it a try, but they want to
MvB know too much of you. I'm not willing to supply that much information.
MvB Do you have other suggestions?
Lie to them.
HTH
--
Cheers,
mlh
trx, srx, sr,
m MvB I did go to the website to sign on and give it a try, but they want to
m MvB know too much of you. I'm not willing to supply that much information.
m MvB Do you have other suggestions?
m Lie to them.
Oke, I think you're right. I lie and try. But...please tell my mom I
lied. ;)
--
Marc
Saturday, December 08, 2001, mlh
In Regards to Yahoo slow?
m Hi Marc,
m Saturday, December 08, 2001, 02:43 pm, you wrote:
MvB I did go to the website to sign on and give it a try, but they want to
MvB know too much of you. I'm not willing to supply that much information.
MvB Do you have
On 12/8/2001, Marc van Breemen wrote:
I did go to the website to sign on and give it a try, but they want to
know too much of you. I'm not willing to supply that much information.
Who says you have to be completely truthful when you fill out those
sign-up forms? :-)
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Hello Marc,
the experince is similar
Best regards,
pkroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
just to recap , you wrote on Saturday, December 08, 2001 at 8:13:25 PM
ACM If you wish to try another, I'd suggest a gmx.net account. I've been
ACM using it without problems for some time now.
Hello Allie,
On 8 Dec 2001, 13:55:55, you wrote:
If you wish to try another, I'd suggest a gmx.net account. I've been
using it without problems for some time now.
Oke, I lied and I cheat and now I have a gmx.net account. It looks
that it works fine and fast. This is a test to see if I see my
Oke, I lied and I cheat and now I have a gmx.net account. It looks
that it works fine and fast. This is a test to see if I see my posting
quicker.
YES!!! Finally a quick response. Bye bye Yahoo, hello GMX.NET!
--
Best regards,
Marcmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Marc,
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 15:27:07 +0100 GMT (08/12/2001, 22:27 +0800 GMT),
Marc van Breemen wrote:
ACM If you give us a sample of one of the delayed message's headers
ACM we'd be more able to tell where the problem lies i.e. where the
ACM delay took place.
MvB My posting 'Just curious
Hello Kevin,
On 8 Dec 2001, 15:56:06, you wrote:
i currently use GMX.Net or GMX.Co.uk if you cant understand
the German Language. they are excellent as they are a
WebMailPop mail server combined. they are also _very_
fast in their sending of emails and its excellent service
38 matches
Mail list logo
