cc vs bcc screwup

2004-07-09 Thread jwayne
I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc. Took _so_ much care in preparing and testing, only to screw-up with the final version. Feel REALLY stupid. Any suggestions or tricks (besides BE MORE CAREFUL IDIOT) that can help prevent this in the future? Thanks

Re: cc vs bcc screwup

2004-07-09 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello TBUDL, on Fri, 9. Jul 2004 at 17:02:47 -0400 jwayne wrote: > Any suggestions or tricks (besides BE MORE CAREFUL IDIOT) that can help prevent this > in the future? what about using a template to bind the recipients to BCC? like: %BCC="your list goes here"%- -- :dAniel_hAhler: shinE! Gnu

Re: cc vs bcc screwup

2004-07-09 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Ian, On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:47:44 +1000GMT (9-7-2004, 23:47 +0200, where I live), you wrote: j>> I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc. IAW> It can't be turned off, but the best solution I have found is to move IAW> it to the top of the header l

Re: cc vs bcc screwup

2004-07-09 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo jwayne, On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 17:02:47 -0400GMT (9-7-2004, 23:02 +0200, where I live), you wrote: J> I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc. J> Took _so_ much care in preparing and testing, only to screw-up with the final J> version. Feel REALLY stup

Re: cc vs bcc screwup

2004-07-11 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Roelof, Friday, July 9, 2004, 8:14:21 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: J>> I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc. J>> Took _so_ much care in preparing and testing, only to screw-up with the final J>> version. Feel REALLY stupid. RO> Next time use the mas

Re: cc vs bcc screwup

2004-07-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo jwayne, On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:51:25 -0400GMT (11-7-2004, 19:51 +0200, where I live), you wrote: GS>> RO> Next time use the mass mailing feature. GS>> Yes I think this is best solution. J> Doesn't this send out a separate email from one's computer to each recipient? Yep it does, that's w

Re[2]: cc vs bcc screwup

2004-07-09 Thread jwayne
On Friday, July 9, 2004, 5:47:44 PM, Ian A. White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IAW> jwayne, IAW> On Saturday, July 10, 2004, 7:02:47 AM, you (jwayne) wrote: IAW> j> I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc. (snip) IAW> I have had this request from others

Re[2]: cc vs bcc screwup

2004-07-10 Thread jwayne
On Friday, July 9, 2004, 9:11:27 PM, Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RO> Hallo Ian, RO> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:47:44 +1000GMT (9-7-2004, 23:47 +0200, where I RO> live), you wrote: RO> j>> I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc. RO> IAW> It ca

Re[2]: cc vs bcc screwup

2004-07-11 Thread jwayne
On Sunday, July 11, 2004, 11:43:39 AM, Greg Strong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GS> Hello Roelof, GS> Friday, July 9, 2004, 8:14:21 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: GS> J>> I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc. GS> J>> Took _so_ much care in preparing and test