Marck D. Pearlstone kindly responded:
J ... I must confirm replying by Select All and F4 does not do the
J trick: it does _not_ override the signature delimiters.
No ... and It shouldn't. Why would you want to anyway? A reply should
always be to a single message. A message ends at the
Hello Allie,
On Tuesday, September 26, 2000 at 02:12:20 GMT -0500 (which was 12:12 AM
where I live) witnesses say A . Curtis Martin typed:
JA The advantages of MIME digests are numerous, but the biggest is that
JA you reply to the individual message, not to the digest.
Additionally, since
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi A,
On 26 September 2000 at 02:28:49 GMT -0500 (which was 08:28 where I
live) A . Curtis Martin wrote and made these points on the subject
of "dealing with digests - yet another question":
ACM F4 didn't allow me to select anyth
Marck D. Pearlstone scripsit:
3) dealing with digests - yet another question
...
This is the very same problem that will occur with digests. What you'd
have to do JM, is to manually copy and paste the desired text block in
your reply message. Paste using the 'paste as quote' option
Hello Januk,
Monday, September 25, 2000, 8:30:28 PM, you wrote:
JA TB has a great MIME digest viewer.
snip
This sounds really cool! Now I just need to find a list I'm
interested in that supports MIME digests to play with this. Egroups doesn't seem to.
--
Using The Bat! 1.46c
Hello Karin,
Monday, September 25, 2000, 3:22:09 PM, you wrote:
KS On 25-09-2000 at 18:58, Gary Mort kindly wrote:
Secondly: Does anyone know of a good digest viewer? What I would like
to be able to do is copy the digest and send it to some application
that will break it up into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 17:30:28 -0700, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA TB has a great MIME digest viewer. Hey Syafril, I seem to remember a
JA discussion about MIME digests way back. Does your server support that
JA type of digest? If so, now that TB
sigh So I'll continue manually cutting and pasting from my non-MIME
digests. That's alright... - unless, of course, someone comes up with
a filtering (or RegEx) rule for taking out the delimiters.
(Or is that nonsense, from a technical point of vies? See, I don't
understand yet on
Hello TBUDL Users,
I have two things I was wondering if someone else has already dealt
with, both involving digests.
Firstly: Does anyone have a macro that could be used to selectively reply
to a digest AND set the subject appropriately? Basically, what I want
to do is highlight a single
On 25-09-2000 at 18:58, Gary Mort kindly wrote:
Secondly: Does anyone know of a good digest viewer? What I would like
to be able to do is copy the digest and send it to some application
that will break it up into seperate messages for me,
quizzed In that case, what is the use of
Monday, September 25, 2000, 9:21:12 PM, scriptur:
Special Issue (#2000-343) - Topics This Issue:
...
6) dealing with digests
...
Hello List, I can't hide my lack of ba(t)sic knowledge here, but I
have noticed that the string "-- ", is sometimes called a standard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi JMReichow,
On 25 September 2000 at 00:15:43 GMT +0200 (which was 23:15 where I
live) JMReichow wrote and made these points on the subject
of "dealing with digests - yet another question":
J Here's my Q: to you quoting and template e
Scripsi:
...
Hello List, I can't hide my lack of ba(t)sic knowledge here,
BUT I have been checking the Archives since, and I must confirm
replying by Select All and F4 does not do the trick: it does _not_
override the signature delimiters.
It turns out that when replying to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi JMReichow,
On 26 September 2000 at 01:54:04 GMT +0200 (which was 00:54 where I
live) JMReichow wrote and made these points on the subject
of "dealing with digests - yet another question":
J ... I must confirm replying by Select All a
Hello Gary,
On Monday, September 25, 2000 at 12:58:23 GMT -0400 (which was 9:58 AM
where I live) witnesses say Gary Mort typed:
Secondly: Does anyone know of a good digest viewer?
TB has a great MIME digest viewer. Hey Syafril, I seem to remember a
discussion about MIME digests way back.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Januk,
On 26 September 2000 at 17:30:28 GMT -0700 (which was 01:30 where I
live) Januk Aggarwal wrote and made these points on the subject
of "dealing with digests":
JA TB has a great MIME digest viewer. Hey Syafril, I seem to r
Hello Marck,
On Monday, September 25, 2000 at 01:17:11 GMT +0100 (which was 5:17 PM
where I live) witnesses say Marck D. Pearlstone typed:
J ... I must confirm replying by Select All and F4 does not do the
J trick: it does _not_ override the signature delimiters.
No ... and It
Hello Marck,
On Monday, September 25, 2000 at 02:13:02 GMT +0100 (which was 6:13 PM
where I live) witnesses say Marck D. Pearlstone typed:
snip some puns :)
You could be right to an extent but I would suggest that, for the
number of times you would actually *want* to quote back the
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
Responding to your article on Mon, 25 Sep 2000 at 17:30:28 GMT -0700
(which was 26/09/2000 7:30 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
Secondly: Does anyone know of a good digest viewer?
JA TB has a great MIME digest viewer. Hey Syafril, I seem to remember a
JA discussion about
19 matches
Mail list logo
