-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:58:49 +0800, Thomas contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
...
TF> Tis is a matter of philosophy, and a number of people on this list
TF> post without any "real name" before the TBUDL lsit address.
I'm one of those. The add
Hello Dierk,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 17:38:38 +0200 GMT (24/06/2001, 23:38 +0800 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
> When I read your message I saw who wrote it (you), but not to whose
> message your answer was written. But I can't see that it is wrong,
Tis is a matter of philosophy, and a number of people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck!
On Sunday, June 24, 2001 at 5:59:30 PM you wrote:
> As you pointed out to Peter, his replies have even less attribution
> :-).
Well, I can see where the difficulties come in (i.e. I just had a look
for the messages I sent myself, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, June 24, 2001, at 9:01:12 AM PDT, Deniz Baygan wrote:
DB> see: http://pink.glowingeyes.net/old.jpg (which we prefer)
DB> Isn't it much better to see who replied who?
DB> and also see: http://pink.glowingeyes.net/new.jpg
DB> To section is r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Dierk,
On 24.06.2001, 18:33 you wrote:
> But, since the sender's name nonetheless reaches me and can be used,
> where exactly is the problem with it disappearing on the server? Or
> may I don't understand it, because I tend to read all messages,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
On 24 June 2001 at 17:33:23 +0200 (which was 16:33 where I live)
Dierk Haasis wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
DH> where exactly is the problem with it disappearing on the server?
In that, where people don't use detailed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Chema!
On Sunday, June 24, 2001 at 4:42:55 PM you wrote:
> I see know. And yes, I can confirm. I see right while writing this.
> You see wrong while reading.
When I read your message I saw who wrote it (you), but not to whose
message your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck!
On Sunday, June 24, 2001 at 4:21:25 PM you wrote:
> Yes, of course you do. The server can't reach out and change the
> message in your TB editor, can it?
> The problem occurs when the message is resent from the server to the
> list mem
Hello Listers,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, at 15:21:25 [GMT +0100] (which was 16:21 where I
live) Marck wrote:
MDP> The problem occurs when the message is resent from the server to
MDP> the list members. The "To" header is changed and the real name is
MDP> stripped from it. This is different to how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
On 24 June 2001 at 15:55:43 +0200 (which was 14:55 where I live)
Dierk Haasis wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
>> I can confirm this. I have asked Syafril to get this back but I don't
>> know if he can. It's because of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck!
On Sunday, June 24, 2001 at 2:31:53 PM you wrote:
DB>> but now every msg is addressed only TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I can confirm this. I have asked Syafril to get this back but I don't
> know if he can. It's because of a change to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
