> -Original Message-
> From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 5:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: TclBlend Initialization Mutex
>
> > Yes, they may be fixed in the future. Though I can't stop
> working waiting
> > for them to b
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Jiang Wu wrote:
> > They need to be fixed. A threaded version of Tcl and a stub enabled
> > extension will need to be the "minimum requirement" if you want to
> > use Tcl Blend.
>
> Yes, they may be fixed in the future. Though I can't stop working waiting
> for them to be fi
> -Original Message-
> From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 4:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: TclBlend Initialization Mutex
>
> > Having to keep two separate versions of Tcl around is just
> not convenient.
> > I am open to
> This seems to be the minimum requirement for using any extension in a
> threaded program. Like using Tcl library (an extension) in a JVM (a
> threaded program). Or are you saying that threaded application like Java or
> threaded-Tcl should never use these extensions?
I think the "minimum requ
> -Original Message-
> From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 3:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: TclBlend Initialization Mutex
>
> > Right now, I am experimenting with using -D_REENTRANT (but without
> > -DTCL_THREADS) to compil
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Jiang Wu wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 1:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: TclBlend Initialization Mutex
> >
> > Con:
> > Non-thread safe extensions may have
> -Original Message-
> From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 1:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: TclBlend Initialization Mutex
>
> Con:
> Non-thread safe extensions may have problems under Unix.
It seems that there are at lea
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Scott Stanton wrote:
> Mo DeJong said:
> > It sure would make life easier if we just required Tcl
> > threads to use Tcl Blend. The notifier thing would go
> > away because we could count on threads being there.
>
> I'm all in favor of this. As the threaded version of Tcl
Mo DeJong said:
> It sure would make life easier if we just required Tcl
> threads to use Tcl Blend. The notifier thing would go
> away because we could count on threads being there.
I'm all in favor of this. As the threaded version of Tcl becomes more
stable, I'd like to see it become the
