[Tcl Java] Tcl Blend vs JACL

2000-05-24 Thread W. John Guineau
We have a medium sized system (~250K lines of C++ and Java) that we want to graft Tcl scripting into. The place where we would integrate scripting is all Java code. I see the recommended solution in this case is to use JACL, but for performance reasons (and other factors) I would prefer to use

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Tcl Blend vs JACL

2000-05-24 Thread W. John Guineau
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff > Sturm > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 2:45 PM > To: W. John Guineau > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Tcl Java] Tcl Blend vs JACL > > > "W. John Guineau" wrote: > > My plan is to load the Tc

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Tcl Blend vs JACL

2000-05-24 Thread W. John Guineau
Ah, thank you for the document pointer! This looks to be the motherload of Tcl Blend/JACL info! john > -Original Message- > From: Jiang Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 2:24 PM > To: 'W. John Guineau'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Tcl Blend vs JACL

2000-05-24 Thread W. John Guineau
]]On Behalf Of Jeff > Sturm > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 3:29 PM > To: W. John Guineau > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Tcl Java] Tcl Blend vs JACL > > > "W. John Guineau" wrote: > > Well, if I use the Java package, then the Tcl code would not > have

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Tcl Blend vs JACL

2000-05-24 Thread W. John Guineau
Wow, same day response, and no noise! (oops ;) Great email list. > -Original Message- > From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 5:13 PM > To: W. John Guineau > Cc: Jiang Wu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java]

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] problem with creating Interp object

2000-05-29 Thread W. John Guineau
Am I confused here? I am currently loading Tcl Blend into Java in the sense that from a live Java VM, I call 'import tcl.lang.*; Interp tclInterp = new Interp()' etc. and I am able to interact with the C based Tcl interpreter, have dynamically loadable extensions (written in Java) that run in the

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] problem with creating Interp object

2000-05-29 Thread W. John Guineau
a/objects etc. I haven't gotten that deep into Tcl Blend yet, so I don't know what it does in this regard. john > -Original Message- > From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 6:29 PM > To: W. John Guineau > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] problem with creating Interp object

2000-05-29 Thread W. John Guineau
ine. john > -Original Message- > From: Zhumei Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 10:03 PM > To: Mo DeJong > Cc: W. John Guineau; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] problem with > creating Interp object

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] what I now know about the deadlock

2000-06-14 Thread W. John Guineau
Without having looked into the innerds of TclBlend's JNI implementation (though it looks quite clean at least) I'd say that removing the monitor calls and JAVA_LOCK are probably fine. I say this because we have a decent size app (~250K lines of C/C++/Java) that uses a JNI layer I wrote. I never