[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend

2000-05-18 Thread Scott Redman
18, 2000 10:33 AM > To: 'Mo DeJong'; Scott Redman > Cc: Jiang Wu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] > Thread question in TclBlend > > > Will the C based Tcl extensions work the same with the threaded version of >

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend

2000-05-18 Thread Jiang Wu
en I will be OK with requiring threaded Tcl with TclBlend. -- Jiang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 2:25 PM To: Scott Redman Cc: Jiang Wu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] R

[Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend

2000-05-17 Thread Mo DeJong
d > into for 8.4). > > -- Scott > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jiang Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 11:59 AM > > To: 'Scott Redman' > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thre

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend

2000-05-16 Thread Scott Redman
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend > > > In theory, JAVA_LOCK sounds like the right thing to do in protecting the > notifier of a non-thread enabled Tcl interpreter. However, the > JAVA_LOCK is > not released while

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend

2000-05-16 Thread Jiang Wu
Message- From: Scott Redman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 6:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend I think Problem 2 isn't a problem for what we're trying to do, but I think you're right that it's

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend

2000-05-15 Thread Scott Redman
I think Problem 2 isn't a problem for what we're trying to do, but I think you're right that it's easy to fix. The JAVA_LOCK() is there to serialize calls to the Notifier. This is not necessary with a thread enabled Tcl library (--enable-threads), but is necessary for a non-thread enabled Tcl. T

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend

2000-05-15 Thread Jiang Wu
DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 2:20 PM To: Scott Redman Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend On Mon, 15 May 2000, Scott Redman wrote: > I was reading Jiang Wu's paper on using Java and Tcl. I have > a quest

[Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend

2000-05-15 Thread Jiang Wu
Is this the situation you are describing? Java Thread Tcl "Owner" Thread C Thread (thread A)(thread B) (thread C) | |(Problem 2) | Call

[Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend

2000-05-15 Thread Mo DeJong
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Scott Redman wrote: > I was reading Jiang Wu's paper on using Java and Tcl. I have > a question for everyone: Jiang's Wrapper Layer is a neat idea, but there are a couple of problems with it. You can't really wrap individual Interp calls because often you need to call other