L PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 2:54 PM
> To: Jiang Wu
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] TclBlend Core Dump
>
>
> Ok, I will put a "package require Tcl 8.3" check into the
to do
"Interp.evalFile()".
Having TclBlend 1.3 require Tcl 8.3 will simplify matters.
-- Jiang Wu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 2:54 PM
To: Jiang Wu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java
Ok, I will put a "package require Tcl 8.3" check into the configure.in
and pkgIndex.tcl files so that Tcl Blend 1.3 will only work on Tcl 8.3
and newer systems.
If anyone wants to run Tcl Blend on older 8.0 -> 8.2 versions of Tcl
they can use the stable release.
Mo Dejong
Red Hat Inc.
On Thu, 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 4:28 PM
To: Jiang Wu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] TclBlend Core Dump
I just ran your example and got a core dump with Tcl Blend 1.2.5
and JDK-1.2.1_03 o
Try hammering in "fork" instead of "vfork".
Look also at the signal code in Tcl itself - it may be resetting
some signals
>>>Mo DeJong said:
> I just ran your example and got a core dump with Tcl Blend 1.2.5
> and JDK-1.2.1_03 on a Solaris 5.6 box. This is a mighty strange
> one. Why would the
I just ran your example and got a core dump with Tcl Blend 1.2.5
and JDK-1.2.1_03 on a Solaris 5.6 box. This is a mighty strange
one. Why would the parent process lose the signal handler in a fork().
Mo Dejong
Red Hat Inc.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Jiang Wu wrote:
> Can someone verify that the follo
