Re: [tcpdump-workers] TCPDUMP 3.9.4 under Fedora Core 5 seems to

2006-09-13 Thread Bruce Keats
Thanks man! Since it has been about a year, is there another version of TCPDUMP out soon? The last version was from Oct 2005. Fedore Core 6 is coming out soon and it would be nice to have these changes picked up. It is very difficult to change the version of TCPDUMP that ships with a Fedora re

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Permission denied wrigint second file when using

2006-09-13 Thread Jefferson Ogata
On 2006-09-13 17:16, John Bourke wrote: > I have a problem with using tethereal to capture and write series of files. > The first file writes ok, so there cannot be an issue with file access of > any type. The second file gives an error. I doubt tethereal has anything to do with this. > [EMAIL P

[tcpdump-workers] Permission denied wrigint second file when using -C option

2006-09-13 Thread John Bourke
Hi, I have a problem with using tethereal to capture and write series of files. The first file writes ok, so there cannot be an issue with file access of any type. The second file gives an error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# mkdir test [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd test [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]

Re: [tcpdump-workers] TCPDUMP 3.9.4 under Fedora Core 5 seems to

2006-09-13 Thread Guy Harris
Guy Harris wrote: I've checked into the main and x.9 branch (so if there's an 0.9.5 release, it'll be in that release; I don't know whether there will be one or not) a change to fix up the addition of off_ll (by centralizing it, and *not* adding it into other off_ values), which should fix va

Re: [tcpdump-workers] TCPDUMP 3.9.4 under Fedora Core 5 seems to

2006-09-13 Thread Guy Harris
Bruce Keats wrote: After digging into the issue, I have come up with a patch. The crux of the problem is that the off_ll is added twice when generating the BPF code that peeks into the LLC header. Yes. The real problem was that the code was a bit confused about where to add in off_ll. I've