Re: [tcpdump-workers] forces (and sctp) patch

2010-01-19 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 19, 2010, at 5:35 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > Note that the info about TCP sequence numbers is gone. Fixed in the top-of-tree version: commit 1859a4aac8b7c5b7ab64c9e748fc10100199a98f Author: Guy Harris Date: Sun Mar 1 13:57:53 2009 -0800 From Ilpo Järvinen: fix printing of TCP

Re: [tcpdump-workers] forces (and sctp) patch

2010-01-19 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:35:15PM +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > but that also gives us the multi-line format. My claim is that the 3.9.8 > format is much preferable (gives me more relevant info) in the face of no > -v option. Seconded. Sequence numbers is highly important for debugging

Re: [tcpdump-workers] forces (and sctp) patch

2010-01-19 Thread sthaug
> Darren> I'm curious about what the motivation is for splitting the > Darren> timestamp and packet data onto separate lines is. > > I think it just kinda happened. > I would have to go back and look at who did what... I think that it > does not occur in IP/TCP, but it does in IP/SCTP

Re: [tcpdump-workers] forces (and sctp) patch

2010-01-19 Thread Darren Reed
On 18/01/2010 9:27 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: "Darren" == Darren Reed writes: Darren> This kind of change to the defaul behaviour warrants bumping Darren> the version number from 4.x to 5.x because this is a Darren> significant change in the output of