Hi Guy,
Then I have another question regarding timestamp in pcap.
In order to get the accurate receiving timestamp of a packet on the NIC
device not supporting hardware timestamping, can I modify the NIC device
driver code to update skb_shared_hwtstamp struct by using TSC in RX routine?
Will pca
18.11.2012, 20:05, "François-Xavier Le Bail" :
> Hello,
>
> Please find the patch version 2 as an attachment.
Neither version made it to the list. Do you have this change published as a git
commit? The original tcpdump repository is here: https://github.com/mcr/tcpdump
--
Denis Ovsienko
___
Attached config.log
___
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Hi Guy,
could you register a DLT for SCTP? It would be similar to
LINKTYPE_IPV4 / DLT_IPV4 or LINKTYPE_IPV6 / DLT_IPV6,
just covering the SCTP packet without any lower layer.
Suggested name: LINKTYPE_SCTP / DLT_SCTP.
Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Thanks a lot for your hel
On Nov 24, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Nov 24, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Michael Tuexen
> wrote:
>
>> could you register a DLT for SCTP? It would be similar to
>> LINKTYPE_IPV4 / DLT_IPV4 or LINKTYPE_IPV6 / DLT_IPV6,
>> just covering the SCTP packet without any lower layer.
>
> No IPv4
Hello,
Yes commit 24c8ca364f46fba30e88b239a33415e731123cd0 in
https://github.com/mcr/tcpdump (Nov 20, 2012).
Francois-Xavier
- Original Message -
> From: Denis Ovsienko
> To: tcpdump-workers
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 5:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] [PATCH] De
Hello,
When I do a "make check", there are 7 errors.
Build on Debian Squeeze, gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8).
Do I miss something ?
Regards,
Francois-Xavier
---
> "ois-Xavier" == ois-Xavier Le Bail writes:
ois-Xavier> Hello,
ois-Xavier> When I do a "make check", there are 7 errors.
ois-Xavier> Build on Debian Squeeze, gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian
ois-Xavier> 4.4.5-8).
install libssl-dev.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tir
It works, thank you.
>
> From: Michael Richardson
>To: François-Xavier Le Bail
>Cc: tcpdump-workers
>Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:27 PM
>Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] "make check" fail on Debian Squeeze
>
>
>> "ois-Xavier" == ois-Xavier Le Bail writ
> "Jaylen" == Jaylen VanOrden writes:
Jaylen> Attached config.log
The list has to remove non-text attachments to keep things sane against
trojans that are sending virii/trojans from legit email addresses.
So, please include your config.log inline.
--
] He who is tired of Weird A
On Nov 26, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>> "Jaylen" == Jaylen VanOrden writes:
>Jaylen> Attached config.log
>
> The list has to remove non-text attachments to keep things sane against
> trojans that are sending virii/trojans from legit email addresses.
> So, please i
@Guy,
Basically, I was adding my own header (instead of radiotap) in kernel and
processing it in userland with my own code. Basically I wrote my own pcap
for that.
Since, I did not get the performance, Now I have added extra fields in
radiotap.
But I still see high CPU usage.
Its interesting that y
On Nov 26, 2012, at 12:58 PM, abhinav narain wrote:
> @Guy,
> Basically, I was adding my own header (instead of radiotap) in kernel and
> processing it in userland with my own code. Basically I wrote my own pcap
> for that.
For your own radio header, what you'd need would be:
your own
13 matches
Mail list logo
