Darren Reed wrote:
> >> It seems that we really wind up needing a registry of co-processor
> >> function indexes... which begin to seem like new instructions in some
> >> sense. Perhaps the difference is that they are better defined, and more
> >> dynamic.
>
> If libpcap/bpf goes down the path of
On 05/21/2015 08:16 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I have no problem with having lts- branches created for distros, and I'd
> rather do that than have "old stable". I'd rather call them something like:
>wheezy-4.7
> or centos7-4.7
Clearly having CentOS branch upstream would make my
