Re: [tcpdump-workers] [PATCH 1/3] Add getnameinfo support to getname

2009-09-01 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 06:54:34PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: > What's the advantage to using getnameinfo() rather than gethostbyaddr(). I'm not sure there are any real advantages, it's just that gethostbyaddr() is marked as obsolete on some systems. -- Miroslav Lichvar - This is the tcpdump-worke

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [PATCH 1/3] Add getnameinfo support to getname and getname6.

2009-08-30 Thread Guy Harris
What's the advantage to using getnameinfo() rather than gethostbyaddr(). - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [PATCH 1/3] Add getnameinfo support to getname and getname6.

2009-08-30 Thread Michael Richardson
Sorry to take so long. Did you get any other reply yet? -- ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON|net architect[ ] m...@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device dri

[tcpdump-workers] [PATCH 1/3] Add getnameinfo support to getname and getname6.

2009-08-16 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
--- addrtoname.c | 44 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/addrtoname.c b/addrtoname.c index e67d114..593840c 100644 --- a/addrtoname.c +++ b/addrtoname.c @@ -224,7 +224,6 @@ static u_int32_t f_localnet; const char * getn

[tcpdump-workers] [PATCH 1/3] Add getnameinfo support to getname and getname6.

2009-08-13 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
--- addrtoname.c | 44 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/addrtoname.c b/addrtoname.c index e67d114..593840c 100644 --- a/addrtoname.c +++ b/addrtoname.c @@ -224,7 +224,6 @@ static u_int32_t f_localnet; const char * getn