Hi Denis,
Am 24.07.2018 um 10:51 schrieb Denis Ovsienko :
> You had this exact discussion 2 weeks ago, didn't you? For the avoidance of
> doubt, this thread isn't about voting.
Ah right, it did feel like some kind of deja vu but I falsely remembered
that to be on a different mailing list.
Sorr
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 21:33:00 +0100 Dagobert Michelsen
wrote
> Hi Jan,
>
> Am 23.07.2018 um 22:04 schrieb Jan Stary :
> >
> > From both a sysadmin and user perspective, I find the GNU autotools
> > amd CMake a major annoyance. Would you please consider doing what e.g.
> > http
On Jul 23 13:30:55, g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > From both a sysadmin and user perspective, I find the GNU autotools
> > amd CMake a major annoyance. Would you please consider doing what e.g.
> > http://mandoc.bsd.lv/cgi-bin/cvsweb/configure does?
On Jul 23, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> From both a sysadmin and user perspective, I find the GNU autotools
> amd CMake a major annoyance. Would you please consider doing what e.g.
> http://mandoc.bsd.lv/cgi-bin/cvsweb/configure does?
What advantage would it give us that would make it wo
Hi Jan,
Am 23.07.2018 um 22:04 schrieb Jan Stary :
>
> From both a sysadmin and user perspective, I find the GNU autotools
> amd CMake a major annoyance. Would you please consider doing what e.g.
> http://mandoc.bsd.lv/cgi-bin/cvsweb/configure does?
>
> A simple, hand written shell script, with
On Jul 23 18:38:17, g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:35:30AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > Let's switch over to cmake as our official mechanism now... i.e. have
> > travis, etc. use it in preference to configure.
>
> From a sysadmin perspective, I find cmake
Hi,
Am 23.07.2018 um 19:11 schrieb Ray Bellis :
> On 23/07/2018 17:38, Gert Doering wrote:
>> I do understand that this is not for me to decide and that you're
>> fully free to ignore me, but I still wanted to say it so nobody can
>> say afterwards "hey, we announced this on the list and nobody sp
On 23/07/2018 17:38, Gert Doering wrote:
> I do understand that this is not for me to decide and that you're
> fully free to ignore me, but I still wanted to say it so nobody can
> say afterwards "hey, we announced this on the list and nobody spoke
> up".
FWIW, I loath CMake too. :p
Ray
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:35:30AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Let's switch over to cmake as our official mechanism now... i.e. have
> travis, etc. use it in preference to configure.
From a sysadmin perspective, I find cmake to be a major annoyance
(because it usually does not exist on
Guy Harris via tcpdump-security wrote:
>>> Need autoreconf.
> I've updated libpcap-release-howto.md, in the
>g...@bpf.tcpdump.org:maintainer-notes repository, to include the
>autoreconf step (and to clean up the formatting, to work as standard
>Markdown, as well as replacing t
10 matches
Mail list logo
