On Dec 21, 2008, at 2:50 AM, Michele Marchetto wrote:
Il giorno ven, 19/12/2008 alle 17.04 -0800, Guy Harris ha scritto:
Just one label, or a full stack?
Just one label.
OK, I've assigned 219 as DLT_MPLS/LINKTYPE_MPLS.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to
Il giorno ven, 19/12/2008 alle 17.04 -0800, Guy Harris ha scritto:
> Just one label, or a full stack?
Just one label.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
On Dec 15, 2008, at 3:15 AM, Michele Marchetto wrote:
Il giorno dom, 14/12/2008 alle 17.43 -0800, Guy Harris ha scritto:
What will the lowest-level header (link-level header) for the mpe
interface's packets be?
It will be a standard MPLS Shim header.
Just one label, or a full stack?
-
This
Il giorno dom, 14/12/2008 alle 17.43 -0800, Guy Harris ha scritto:
> What will the lowest-level header (link-level header) for the mpe
> interface's packets be?
It will be a standard MPLS Shim header.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Ken Bantoft wrote:
Request for another DLT value - see below.
On 10-Dec-08, at 1:58 PM, Michele Marchetto wrote:
Hi ken.
I'm the openbsd developer who is coding the support for mpls.
We need to set up a virtual interface mpe(4), and we
would like to have the DL
Hi,
Request for another DLT value - see below.
On 10-Dec-08, at 1:58 PM, Michele Marchetto wrote:
Hi ken.
I'm the openbsd developer who is coding the support for mpls.
We need to set up a virtual interface mpe(4), and we
would like to have the DLT_MPLS number in sync with you guys, as
we di
