[tcpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS

2007-02-06 Thread Florent . Drouin
Hello, I need a new datalink value (LINKTYPE_MTP2_FCS) to manage MTP2 frame with Checksum. (See http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200702/msg00206.html ) Once I will have the value, I will provide the patch for libpcap. Thanks in advance Best regards Florent - This is the tcpd

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS

2007-02-06 Thread Stephen Donnelly
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 18:18 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > I need a new datalink value (LINKTYPE_MTP2_FCS) to manage MTP2 frame with > Checksum. > (See http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200702/msg00206.html ) > > Once I will have the value, I will provide the patch fo

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS

2007-02-08 Thread Florent . Drouin
mp.org Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS tcpdu

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS

2007-02-08 Thread Stephen Donnelly
As a question to the community in general, is it true that the link layer checksum is not normally included in libpcap records, and that only frames with valid L2 checksums are normally captured? If so it seems clear that DLT_MTP2 (and other) link types should not have the L2 checksum present appe

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS

2007-02-08 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Stephen Donnelly wrote: As a question to the community in general, is it true that the link layer checksum is not normally included in libpcap records, No. For example, sometimes a frame in a DLT_EN10MB capture might have the CRC, and other times it might not.

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS

2007-02-19 Thread Stephen Donnelly
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org > Sent by: cc: > &

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS

2007-02-19 Thread Florent . Drouin
cpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS tcpdu

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS

2007-10-04 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 19, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Stephen Donnelly wrote: It seems that if it is worth making the change, it is also worth using a couple of bits to indicate whether a 16 or 32-bit CRC/FCS is present as Guy suggested. This could then be used on linktypes such as PPP_SERIAL which can have either

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a new DLT for MTP2 with FCS (repost)

2007-02-18 Thread Guy Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As requested few days before, I would like to use a new DLT to distinguish between MTP2 without FCS (the current DLT_MTP2) and MTP2 with FCS. Or perhaps the link type value in the file header should be interpreted as having bitfields, with the lower 16 bits being the