Re: [tcpdump-workers] bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ?

2016-05-10 Thread Lukas Tribus
> Ok, I work on Debian. > But why each distribution does not follow libpcap writer (tcpdump dev team) > from the begining ? Is there something which leads each distro to write > their own soname ? Why isn't there an unique soname for all distro The links that have previously been provided answer t

Re: [tcpdump-workers] bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ?

2016-05-10 Thread ikuzar RABE
Ok, I work on Debian. But why each distribution does not follow libpcap writer (tcpdump dev team) from the begining ? Is there something which leads each distro to write their own soname ? Why isn't there an unique soname for all distro 2016-05-06 19:18 GMT+02:00 hans : > On May 06 17:37:51, rf

Re: [tcpdump-workers] bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ?

2016-05-06 Thread hans
On May 06 17:37:51, rfranco...@debian.org wrote: > > is normal that soname of libpcap.so.1.6.2 is libpcap.so.0.8 ? > This is specific to Debian and its derivatives, for more details see: > https://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/libpcap-faq.html And it's /usr/lib/libpcap.so.8.1 on current OpenBSD

Re: [tcpdump-workers] bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ?

2016-05-06 Thread Romain Francoise
Hello, On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 05:22:24PM +0200, ikuzar RABE wrote: > is normal that soname of libpcap.so.1.6.2 is libpcap.so.0.8 ? This is specific to Debian and its derivatives, for more details see: https://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/libpcap-faq.html -- Romain Francoise http://people.

[tcpdump-workers] bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ?

2016-05-06 Thread ikuzar RABE
Hi all, is normal that soname of libpcap.so.1.6.2 is libpcap.so.0.8 ? Why it is not libpcap.so.1 or higher ? ikuzar:~# objdump -p /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.6.2 | grep SONAME SONAME libpcap.so.0.8 ikuzar:~# objdump -p /usr/local/lib/libpcap.so.1.1.1 | grep SONAME SO