Re: [tcpdump-workers] patch to allow tcpslice to work with zero and one packet captures

2009-04-01 Thread Sam Roberts
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Sam Roberts wrote: > tcpslice fails on packet captures with zero or one packet in them. Given > an arbitrary set of captures, it is entirely possible that some of them > don't have packets or have small numbers of packets. Anything else I need to push this patch u

Re: [tcpdump-workers] patch to allow tcpslice to work with zero and

2009-03-30 Thread Sam Roberts
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Yes, we do take patches for tcpslice. > > Sam, please send GPG signed SSH key, and we can move the CVS into git... > The CVS isn't gone, it's just not primary. Here you go. Do the patches look ok? They work well for us. -BEGIN

Re: [tcpdump-workers] patch to allow tcpslice to work with zero and one packet captures

2009-03-25 Thread Michael Richardson
Yes, we do take patches for tcpslice. Sam, please send GPG signed SSH key, and we can move the CVS into git... The CVS isn't gone, it's just not primary. -- ] Y'avait une poule de jammé dans l'muffler!| firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa,

[tcpdump-workers] patch to allow tcpslice to work with zero and one packet captures

2009-03-25 Thread Sam Roberts
Do you all maintain tcpslice? I'm having trouble finding an upstream repo or maintainer for it. tcpslice fails on packet captures with zero or one packet in them. Given an arbitrary set of captures, it is entirely possible that some of them don't have packets or have small numbers of packets. I