[tcpdump-workers] pcap format / standard(s)

2007-05-16 Thread Jesse Norell
Hello, I hope this is an appropriate question for this group. I'm with a group (WISPA) working on developing a standard for delivery of data to meet the CALEA law requirements. We'd like to use pcap as the format for likely obvious reasons, though as I'm looking into the specifics I run into d

Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcap format / standard(s)

2007-05-16 Thread Guy Harris
On May 16, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Jesse Norell wrote: I hope this is an appropriate question for this group. I'm with a group (WISPA) working on developing a standard for delivery of data to meet the CALEA law requirements. Why is the Women's International Squash Players Association working on

Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcap format / standard(s)

2007-10-04 Thread Jesse Norell
Hello, On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:31 -0700, Guy Harris wrote: > > You would be correct in assuming that what is actually in use today is > > http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/LibpcapFileFormat I'm wondering about the copyright implications of including content from that wiki in a

Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcap format / standard(s)

2007-10-08 Thread Carter Bullard
Hey Jesse, Why not just reference annex A? It is already a standard that CALEA recognizes. The wiki is not the first compilation of the information you're interested in referencing (hasn't changed since the first implementation so way back when, other than the timestamp precision field, which is

Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcap format / standard(s)

2007-10-08 Thread Jesse Norell
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 11:40 -0400, Carter Bullard wrote: > Hey Jesse, > Why not just reference annex A? It is already a standard that > CALEA recognizes. The wiki is not the first compilation of the > information you're interested in referencing (hasn't changed > since the first implementation so

Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcap format / standard(s)

2007-10-08 Thread Carter Bullard
Hey Jesse, Well, the wiki actually doesn't have any rights to the content on the particular page that you are interested in using, and I'm interested that they aren't meeting the BSD licensing requirement that tcpdump is released under, as it is the actual license that applies. Having a link to