Re: [tcpdump-workers] verbose decoding without assigned port number

2013-02-08 Thread Denis Ovsienko
Denis There are network protocols that have an assigned port Denis number, and there are other that don't or are commonly used Denis on non-assigned ports, such as HTTP on port 8080. Looking at Denis function tcp_print() in file print-tcp.c, it is clear how the Denis

Re: [tcpdump-workers] verbose decoding without assigned port number

2013-02-08 Thread Michael Richardson
Denis == Denis Ovsienko infrastat...@yandex.ru writes: Currently the -T option is the only resort at the IP layer and UDP layer. It could apply to TCP too, perhaps. Denis It looks like -T applies. I've got a working code and am Denis producing a sample capture. The ZeroMQ

Re: [tcpdump-workers] verbose decoding without assigned port number

2013-01-31 Thread Michael Richardson
Denis == Denis Ovsienko infrastat...@yandex.ru writes: Denis There are network protocols that have an assigned port Denis number, and there are other that don't or are commonly used Denis on non-assigned ports, such as HTTP on port 8080. Looking at Denis function tcp_print() in

Re: [tcpdump-workers] verbose decoding without assigned port number

2013-01-31 Thread Denis Ovsienko
Currently the -T option is the only resort at the IP layer and UDP layer. It could apply to TCP too, perhaps. Thanks, that seems to be OK to start with. It would be nice to have a way for each ULP decoders to register their name so that it's not so switch() stmt based, and then to have a