Re: [tcpdump-workers] x.9 branch

2004-10-11 Thread Michael Richardson
> "Guy" == Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> any suggestion for a x.9 branch date ? what about 31-oct-04 ? Guy> Speaking of "x.9 branch", should the VERSION files in libpcap Guy> and tcpdump change to "0.9-PRE-CVS" and "3.9-PRE-CVS", Guy> respectively? okay. -- ]

Re: [tcpdump-workers] x.9 branch

2004-10-11 Thread Guy Harris
On Sep 24, 2004, at 6:02 AM, Hannes Gredler wrote: any suggestion for a x.9 branch date ? what about 31-oct-04 ? Speaking of "x.9 branch", should the VERSION files in libpcap and tcpdump change to "0.9-PRE-CVS" and "3.9-PRE-CVS", respectively? - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lis

Re: [tcpdump-workers] x.9 branch

2004-10-07 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:02:07PM +0200, Hannes Gredler wrote: > any suggestion for a x.9 branch date ? what about 31-oct-04 ? I guess this isn't going to be in time for FreeBSD 5.3, but no biggie. Any further thoughts on a date for a new release cycle? Regards, BMS pgpqDonigyNec.pgp Descripti

Re: [tcpdump-workers] x.9 branch

2004-09-24 Thread Hannes Gredler
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:23:55PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: | (blah blah blah the other brain fart was sending it from sonic.net again | blah blah blah duplicate message dissector blah blah blah) | | Michael Richardson wrote: | | > You tell me. | > We didn't do a 0.8.4 yet, but this sounds lik