Re: [tcpinc] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2017-11-15 Thread David Mazieres
Amanda Baber writes: > I guess if we want expert review for non-IETF stream docs it actually > would be „IETF Review or RFC Required with Expert Review“… Amanda, > does that still makes sense to you? > > [AB] That works for us too. I think that in that case we would call it > “IETF Review or Expe

[tcpinc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-14.txt

2017-11-15 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the TCP Increased Security WG of the IETF. Title : TCP-ENO: Encryption Negotiation Option Authors : Andrea Bittau Daniel B. Giff

[tcpinc] (Ideally) final draft 14 of TCP-ENO posted

2017-11-15 Thread dm-list-tcpcrypt
Version 14, which I hope can be the final draft of the TCP-ENO specification, has been posted here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno/ Thanks very much to everyone who provided reviews and feedback. We have attempted to incorporate all the comments we received fro