As a co-author, I support adoption of tcpcrypt.
-Eric Smith
On 10/20/15 9:47 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
Hi all,
please indicate if you support adoption of
draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-04 as a tcpinc working group item, or
not, by
Monday, Nov 2, 2015.
draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt is on
Greetings, all,
I support the adoption of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt as a WG item.
Cheers,
Brian
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 18:47, Mirja Kühlewind
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> please indicate if you support adoption of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-04 as
> a tcpinc working group item, or not, by
>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Derek Fawcus
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:47:43PM +0200, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
>> please indicate if you support adoption of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-04 as
>> a tcpinc working group item,
>
> I support its adoption.
I support adoption
>
> _
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:47:43PM +0200, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
> please indicate if you support adoption of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-04 as
> a tcpinc working group item,
I support its adoption.
___
Tcpinc mailing list
Tcpinc@ietf.org
https://www.
I support adoption of Bittau / tcpcrypt. We need something that is
light, focused and has precise experience backing its deployment.
iang
On 20/10/2015 17:47 pm, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
Hi all,
please indicate if you support adoption of
draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-04 as a tcpinc working gr
I support this draft too (no surprise there!). To be clear though,
although I prefer tcpcrypt, I believe either approach would be much
better than doing nothing.
Of your three ways to proceed, I think (1) is unlikely to occur because
the difference is philosophical rather than just technical.
Support
Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Tcpinc mailing list
Tcpinc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
Unsurprisingly, I support adoption of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-04.
Tcpcrypt is simple, relatively self-contained, and custom tailored to
the goals of the TCPINC working group. It has no external dependencies
that could block progress. Tcpcrypt is also well suited for
implementation in TCP st
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Mirja Kühlewind <
mirja.kuehlew...@tik.ee.ethz.ch> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please indicate if you support adoption of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-04
> as a tcpinc working group item, or not, by
>
> Monday, Nov 2, 2015.
>
> draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt is one
Given the choices presented, I support adoption of this draft.
S.
On 20/10/15 17:47, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please indicate if you support adoption of
> draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-04 as a tcpinc working group item, or not, by
>
> Monday, Nov 2, 2015.
>
> draft-bittau-tcpin
Hi all,
please indicate if you support adoption of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-04 as
a tcpinc working group item, or not, by
Monday, Nov 2, 2015.
draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt is one candidate for tcpinc where the first
version of that draft was proposed about a year ago. In the mean
11 matches
Mail list logo
