Re: [tcpinc] new drafts of TCP-ENO and tcpcrypt

2017-10-13 Thread iang
On 08/10/2017 00:33, Gregorio Guidi wrote: ... Having ECDHE-Curve25519 and ECDHE-Curve448 as MTI was suggested, but the lack of implementations for Curve448 was mentioned. Unfortunately this is still an issue: there are implementations available but no stable and well-proved implementation

Re: [tcpinc] new drafts of TCP-ENO and tcpcrypt

2017-10-07 Thread dm-list-tcpcrypt
Gregorio Guidi writes: > Having followed the standardization of tcpcrypt on the tpcinc mailing > list (as a passive observer), I wanted to check with you on a point > that was not heavily discussed as far as I can see: the choice of the > "mandatory to implement" (MTI)

Re: [tcpinc] new drafts of TCP-ENO and tcpcrypt

2017-10-07 Thread Gregorio Guidi
On 10/05/2017 01:42 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote: Hi Daniel, hi all, thanks for all the work and changes. I just realized that I didn’t answer (yet) David’s last mail but the resolution now is fine. Thanks for the additional explanation! I’ve just requested IETF last call for both docs