Just in case it wasn't clear: that was my bad attempt at humor, nothing
more.
☮
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Mukunda Modell
wrote:
> I hear that breathing can be dangerous. Showers also.
>
> I apologize for adding precisely nothing useful to this otherwise
> intere
I hear that breathing can be dangerous. Showers also.
I apologize for adding precisely nothing useful to this otherwise
interesting and thought provoking thread.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Thanks both for sharing those links. It quickly became clear to me that my
> de
Neat idea! Thanks for sharing.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Guillaume Lederrey
wrote:
> Thanks Kevin for the reminder!
>
> So here is a short description of the "Adjectives Game":
>
> First, note of warning, this game is probably getting deeper and more
> personal than most team are comfortab
turned out to be, or that
> get scope creep. That's fine. If that's the case, though, ruthless grooming
> into dedicated projects and Milestones seems appropriate.
>
> Regardless, it seems like all of these approaches benefit from having
> someone who pays attention to the growi
For tasks with many tiny subtasks, I choose to outline them in the
description and avoid creating separate subtasks.
For bigger 'epic' tasks, it might be better to collect them together under
a milestone in the parent project.
For tasks with several interdependent sub-tasks I think the phabricato
Sounds promising to me. I find the feedback is helpful but the annual
review seems to be fairly daunting for everyone and not terribly effective.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Recently, we have had some conversations within TPG about the pros and
> cons of annual (and quar
This is really an interesting topic to me personally because I spent a year
at deviantART working on a faceted ontology to classify art works by facets
such as Form, Medium, Technique and Genre. It was a really hard technical
problem to solve and we never really finished that work before deviantART
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Max Binder wrote:
> You can require certain projects for all task creations going through your
>> creation form, but then the user can't add any extra projects themselves
>> (AFAIK).
>
>
> Do you happen to know if Alex is correct about this?
>
>
Almost correct bu
I created a custom form just to demonstrate the possibilities and encourage
people to request custom forms. Simply submit the example to request your
own custom form:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/edit/form/17/
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Alex Monk wrote:
> To get a cust
Tweaking the code during merge is actually something differential /
arcanist already supports. It's amending someone else's revision (outside
of the merge process) that is currently prevented in arcanist. That's why I
wrote https://secure.phabricator.com/D15468 and proposed it to upstream. I
inadve
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
> I would mention that in some cases, I would prefer to accept the commit as
> is, and then perform minor refactoring, such as changing a name, fixing a
> typo, or rearranging the code. Not only does that clearly separate
> authorship, but it
>
> psychological safety — a group culture that the Harvard Business School
> professor Amy Edmondson defines as a ‘‘shared belief held by members of a
> team that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking.’’ Psychological
> safety is ‘‘a sense of confidence that the team will not embarrass, r
That sounds like a bug to me - we shouldn't have to retain the prefixes -
I'll report that upstream.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> Joel Aufrecht, 20/02/2016 00:16:
>
>> Subprojects often appear in the UI as Project > sub-project, but they
>> appear in name comple
Thanks for writing this, Kevin.
We won't be enabling the 'core' points field during the initial upgrade.
That will happen after it's well tested and known not to break anything.
Forms is the most exciting feature but also project pages get a major
update and much of the user interface has been st
Thank's for sharing, Grace! It's a good article and very thought provoking.
Ever since I started as a Release Engineer, more than a year ago, I have
been very frustrated by similar issues to those highlighted in this
article. The WMF really could benefit a lot from better developer tooling
and be
The ideas they are advocating strike me as the antithesis of how things are
done at wikimedia.
I often feel a significant friction and opposition to changing anything, to
the point where it feels difficult to get anything done because we must
spend as much time explaining and defending an idea as
Phabricator _does_ support replacing the username in shared search links.
See "saving and sharing queries" on
https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/search/
To make the username dynamic simply select the magnifying-glass icon in any
search field that takes a username, and select "
I have a couple of useful saved searches:
Non-stalled:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/query/IkTiXHryIEDj/
This finds all assigned, open tasks excluding the tasks set to stalled.
I use this as my default search so that I see the things I should be
working on actively
Tasks by activit
18 matches
Mail list logo
