Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam could be referring to something else.
Actually that was back when I was trying to use the Cryptix provider
under GCJ in order to use PureTLS. I ran into a sieres of bugs which
led me to believe that whoever wrote libgcj's java.security.* had
never t
Goran Thyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is more a question of syntax not handled by gcj at the moment.
What syntax does GCJ not handle?
> A way around syntax problems is to just compile .class files
> generate by jikes/javac with gcj. But this is no fun debugging.
I personally don't use G
> "Brian" == Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> Unless I'm missing something, the libraries probably aren't
Brian> doing enough of the required API level security checks that are
Brian> supposed to be going on.
Ok, thanks. I know we need to do this kind of security audit of the
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:31:56AM -0800, Adam Megacz wrote:
> What's missing? Crypto- and network-wise, I've gotten a full SSL
> implementation running under GCJ (http://www.xwt.org/tinyssl).
freenet has all crypto code it needs in itself.
It is more a question of syntax not handled by gcj
at th
Gordan Bobic:
> I suppose that given enough time, effort and network monitoring all
> over the internet, the requests could all eventualy be tracked back to the
> singular source server. This cannot be done as such for static cached
> documents as they will generally come from different servers.
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Adam" == Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Adam> You can also run Sun's bytecodes through GCJ (for example, to replace
> Adam> libgcj's broken java.security.*), but the resulting binary probably
> Adam> can't be redistributed.
>
> Please
> "Adam" == Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> You can also run Sun's bytecodes through GCJ (for example, to replace
Adam> libgcj's broken java.security.*), but the resulting binary probably
Adam> can't be redistributed.
Please file bug reports about what you know to be broken in
G?ran Thyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I use pre-3.1 CVS snapshots for my experiments with freenet and gcj.
> 3.1 is much better then 3.0 BUT at this time it is still not up to
> the task of compiling freenet out-of-the-box.
What's missing? Crypto- and network-wise, I've gotten a full SSL
imp
> "Göran" == Göran Thyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Göran> 3.1 is much better then 3.0 BUT at this time it is still not up to
Göran> the task of compiling freenet out-of-the-box.
Please report all bugs to the gcc Gnats database. I can't promise
we'll fix them all in time for any particular
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, William Ahern wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:07:59PM +, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> > 4) Would it be possible for the GCJ compiled binaries to be made available
> > for Linux/FreeBSD in addition to the daily .jar image? Most distributions
> > still do not come with GCC v3,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Timm Murray wrote:
> > 2) What would be involved in serving dynamic content on FreeNet? Rather
> > than uploading the "free sites" as just files, and then trying to
> > reconstruct the site file by file, it would be nice if it was possible to
> > designate a normal web server
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Mark J Roberts wrote:
> > Basically, what I'm talking about is the idea of using FreeNet as
> > a mixnet, rather than a file store pre se.
>
> It's possible, though Freenet isn't optimized for that - its
> performance and the strength of its anonymity would suffer,
I can def
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> > 4) Would it be possible for the GCJ compiled binaries to be made available
> > for Linux/FreeBSD in addition to the daily .jar image?
>
> If you get to compile and run it under gcj, we would be happy to provide
> it :-)
Ah, I see, it's THAT bad. ;
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:39:27PM -0800, William Ahern wrote:
> there was a recent ibm developer works article that showed gcj natively
> compiled apps to *not* be any faster than those run in a jvm; they ran
> much slower, even.
.. but he was using 3.0,
current codebase (pre-3.1) has improved
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:07:59PM +, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> 4) Would it be possible for the GCJ compiled binaries to be made available
> for Linux/FreeBSD in addition to the daily .jar image? Most distributions
> still do not come with GCC v3, and even for those that do, latest snapshots
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
