> It does, and it's been proposed before. I think I was the 1009th person to
> suggest it, making you the 1010th unless I've missed somebody. ;-)
oops ;)
Well I understand that it would be hard to work around the routing. I
guess we will have to do it the Frost way.
By the way, when doing an u
> multiple requests and redundant blocks, it's the only sane way to
> deal with files of nontrivial size, and multiplexing requests is a
> big throughput and reliability win. What this means is that a
Yes, splitfiles and FEC will make big files less of a pain than they are
now. I hope the impleme
> Does this sound like a nifty feature??
It does, and it's been proposed before. I think I was the 1009th person to
suggest it, making you the 1010th unless I've missed somebody. ;-)
Unfortunately the problem is that requests are routed towards the node
that's expected to hold the requested
Are:
> This way I an always guaranteed that the files I share will be available
> on freenet, as long as someone can reach my node. (Using large htls).
We don't allow large HTLs because they're an easy DoS attack, and
besides, if the routing works your large-HTL request would only
encounter a rel
I have another idea for Freenet.
Say I run a permanent node on my cheap slow bandwith Cable modem, and I
want to host a freesite. The way it works now, I have to use freeweb to
submit my site every day, even the static parts. And I won't have any
guarante that it will remain on freenet, because m
