MAIL ERROR
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Matt Fisher wrote:
> You're correct. I got started on this train of thought after reading
> an old USENIX paper[1]. The line I suggested for deletion is identical
> to what section 1.2.1 of that paper recommended should always be
> included. Recent material contin
Hi,
I just ran tried to install the kernel and ran:
make depend
make install
Since I forgot running "make" and since there is no dependency for
"bsd" the target removed my old kernel without installing the new
one.
How about this patch for the i386 target?
cvs server: Diffing .
Index: Make
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:45:39 -0700
Philip Guenther wrote:
Many solid points and:
>If the answers to those questions are "yes", then you should say so
>and back it up. If not, why should we apply a diff to remove code
>from someone who doesn't know why the code is there? As is, I believe
>you d
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 08:45:39PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
[snip]
> If they lack research like this one, I don't want to see them either.
Thanks Philip, you just wrote what I was going to write.
Any diff, and signal diffs even more so, requires understanding of
what you are changing.
