Hello,
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:08:43PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
are we still tracking the upstream less(1) and if so, is the
behavioral change acceptable there?
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 03:37:46PM +1030, Matthew Haub wrote:
We no longer track upstream less(1). The last sync was 7 years
2010/4/5 Richard Stride f...@nexxus.net:
Sean Kennedy wrote:
I concur, B it was a Valid question on running OpenBSD in a VM.
Unless someone has answered directly, I'll short-run it here.
Just to add my 2 cents, I run OpenBSD-current (i386) under VirtualBox 3.0.4
r50677 64-bit. The host
this brings the UQ_BAD_HID entries together, lines up the
columns a bit better, and adds a short description for some
of the quirks.
any comments? ok?
Index: usb_quirks.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/usb_quirks.c,v
retrieving
On 2010/04/06 10:47, Stuart Henderson wrote:
this brings the UQ_BAD_HID entries together, lines up the
columns a bit better, and adds a short description for some
of the quirks.
any comments? ok?
better with some spaces-tabs (prompted by mail from halex).
Index: usb_quirks.c
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Sean Kennedy woodentu...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I concur, it was a Valid question on running OpenBSD in a VM.
really, i was very radical in the last email. really. shut it up and
hack. maybe starting helping the virtualbox guys to close the related
bug at
Hello,
The openssl command line tool treats the non-null terminated buffer
mbuf as a C string when using the pop3 s_client feature. This causes
a segmentation fault with malloc.conf option J set when BIO_printf()
runs off the end of the buffer. The following patch fixes PR 6282.
Matthew
Index:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Matthew Haub
matthew.h...@alumni.adelaide.edu.au wrote:
This patch adds support for wordexp(3) and wordfree(3) to libc. These
functions conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (POSIX). The implementation
comes from NetBSD and uses a shell builtin, wordexp, to perform the
I think we should stand up to crap and not ever impliment it.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Matthew Haub
matthew.h...@alumni.adelaide.edu.au wrote:
This patch adds support for wordexp(3) and wordfree(3) to libc. These
functions conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (POSIX). The implementation
Hi
You'll have to implement wordexp(3) in libc too before this does us any
good.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:49:58PM +0930, Matthew Haub wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:08:43PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
are we still tracking the upstream less(1) and if so, is the
behavioral
Whoops, reading too slow.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 05:41:59PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
Hi
You'll have to implement wordexp(3) in libc too before this does us any
good.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:49:58PM +0930, Matthew Haub wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:08:43PM
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Matthew Haub
matthew.h...@alumni.adelaide.edu.au wrote:
This patch adds support for wordexp(3) and wordfree(3) to libc. These
functions conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (POSIX). The implementation
comes from NetBSD and uses a shell builtin, wordexp, to
hopefully this is the last round;
- don't duplicate documentation from .h in .c
- move .h documentation to the same line as the #define for easier grepping
- reword .h doc slightly, mostly to fit on 1 line where possible, change
text for UQ_EHCI_NEEDTO_DISOWN to something that seems
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:19:18PM -0400, Brad wrote:
The following diff adds the remaining PCI ids for the Intel AHCI
controllers with a RAID mode to the existing ICH8 / ICH10 PCI ids.
Add the Intel ICH7 (82801GHM / GR), ICH9 (82801I) and ICH10 (82801JD),
6321ESB and PCH (3400) RAID mode
Please test the following diff if you have a system utilizing the
BCM5709S chipset. This diff adds support for the fiber PHY coupled
with the BCM5709S controller.
Index: pci/if_bnx.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_bnx.c,v
Why?
RAID mode is NOT a valid ID for ahci.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:09:47PM -0400, Brad wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:19:18PM -0400, Brad wrote:
The following diff adds the remaining PCI ids for the Intel AHCI
controllers with a RAID mode to the existing ICH8 / ICH10 PCI ids.
Please test the following diff if you have a system utilizing the
BCM5709S chipset. This diff adds support for the fiber PHY coupled
with the BCM5709S controller.
This is wrong. Test if you have *any* bnx. When a diff of this nasty
complexity and size goes by, noone could give a rats ass if
16 matches
Mail list logo