Re: [patch] less: filename globbing/expansion

2010-04-06 Thread Matthew Haub
Hello, On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:08:43PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: are we still tracking the upstream less(1) and if so, is the behavioral change acceptable there? On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 03:37:46PM +1030, Matthew Haub wrote: We no longer track upstream less(1). The last sync was 7 years

Re: which ISO for a VM?

2010-04-06 Thread matteo filippetto
2010/4/5 Richard Stride f...@nexxus.net: Sean Kennedy wrote: I concur, B it was a Valid question on running OpenBSD in a VM. Unless someone has answered directly, I'll short-run it here. Just to add my 2 cents, I run OpenBSD-current (i386) under VirtualBox 3.0.4 r50677 64-bit. The host

usb_quirks tidying

2010-04-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
this brings the UQ_BAD_HID entries together, lines up the columns a bit better, and adds a short description for some of the quirks. any comments? ok? Index: usb_quirks.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/usb_quirks.c,v retrieving

Re: usb_quirks tidying

2010-04-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/04/06 10:47, Stuart Henderson wrote: this brings the UQ_BAD_HID entries together, lines up the columns a bit better, and adds a short description for some of the quirks. any comments? ok? better with some spaces-tabs (prompted by mail from halex). Index: usb_quirks.c

Re: which ISO for a VM?

2010-04-06 Thread Gleydson Soares
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Sean Kennedy woodentu...@hotmail.com wrote: I concur, it was a Valid question on running OpenBSD in a VM. really, i was very radical in the last email. really. shut it up and hack. maybe starting helping the virtualbox guys to close the related bug at

[patch] openssl: pr/6282

2010-04-06 Thread Matthew Haub
Hello, The openssl command line tool treats the non-null terminated buffer mbuf as a C string when using the pop3 s_client feature. This causes a segmentation fault with malloc.conf option J set when BIO_printf() runs off the end of the buffer. The following patch fixes PR 6282. Matthew Index:

Re: [patch] libc: wordexp support

2010-04-06 Thread Ted Unangst
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Matthew Haub matthew.h...@alumni.adelaide.edu.au wrote: This patch adds support for wordexp(3) and wordfree(3) to libc. These functions conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (POSIX). The implementation comes from NetBSD and uses a shell builtin, wordexp, to perform the

Re: [patch] libc: wordexp support

2010-04-06 Thread Theo de Raadt
I think we should stand up to crap and not ever impliment it. On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Matthew Haub matthew.h...@alumni.adelaide.edu.au wrote: This patch adds support for wordexp(3) and wordfree(3) to libc. These functions conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (POSIX). The implementation

Re: [patch] less: filename globbing/expansion

2010-04-06 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Hi You'll have to implement wordexp(3) in libc too before this does us any good. On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:49:58PM +0930, Matthew Haub wrote: Hello, On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:08:43PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: are we still tracking the upstream less(1) and if so, is the behavioral

Re: [patch] less: filename globbing/expansion

2010-04-06 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Whoops, reading too slow. On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 05:41:59PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: Hi You'll have to implement wordexp(3) in libc too before this does us any good. On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:49:58PM +0930, Matthew Haub wrote: Hello, On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:08:43PM

Re: [patch] libc: wordexp support

2010-04-06 Thread Theo de Raadt
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Matthew Haub matthew.h...@alumni.adelaide.edu.au wrote: This patch adds support for wordexp(3) and wordfree(3) to libc. These functions conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (POSIX). The implementation comes from NetBSD and uses a shell builtin, wordexp, to

Re: usb_quirks tidying

2010-04-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
hopefully this is the last round; - don't duplicate documentation from .h in .c - move .h documentation to the same line as the #define for easier grepping - reword .h doc slightly, mostly to fit on 1 line where possible, change text for UQ_EHCI_NEEDTO_DISOWN to something that seems

Re: ahci(4) Intel RAID mode pci ids diff.

2010-04-06 Thread Brad
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:19:18PM -0400, Brad wrote: The following diff adds the remaining PCI ids for the Intel AHCI controllers with a RAID mode to the existing ICH8 / ICH10 PCI ids. Add the Intel ICH7 (82801GHM / GR), ICH9 (82801I) and ICH10 (82801JD), 6321ESB and PCH (3400) RAID mode

bnx(4) BCM5709S fiber support.

2010-04-06 Thread Brad
Please test the following diff if you have a system utilizing the BCM5709S chipset. This diff adds support for the fiber PHY coupled with the BCM5709S controller. Index: pci/if_bnx.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_bnx.c,v

Re: ahci(4) Intel RAID mode pci ids diff.

2010-04-06 Thread Marco Peereboom
Why? RAID mode is NOT a valid ID for ahci. On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:09:47PM -0400, Brad wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:19:18PM -0400, Brad wrote: The following diff adds the remaining PCI ids for the Intel AHCI controllers with a RAID mode to the existing ICH8 / ICH10 PCI ids.

Re: bnx(4) BCM5709S fiber support.

2010-04-06 Thread Theo de Raadt
Please test the following diff if you have a system utilizing the BCM5709S chipset. This diff adds support for the fiber PHY coupled with the BCM5709S controller. This is wrong. Test if you have *any* bnx. When a diff of this nasty complexity and size goes by, noone could give a rats ass if