Hi list !
It seems that I can't get Gmail to not splitting lines when it feels
an urge to do so.
Here is the unmangled version of the said diff:
The REPLACE_GETOPT symbol seems to have been introduced for smoothing
the transition from an old implementation of getopt(3) and the current
Teško Vam je da svaki put u proleDe pravite veliko spremanje
i nakon toga budete iscrpljeni i premoreni danima?
KonaD
no - oD
istite dom bez napora i muke i to uz POPUST i POKLON!
Kupovinom bilo koja 2 ili više proizvoda iz ponude za ProleDno
D
išDenje ostvarujete pravo na 10% POPUSTA na
I noticed that vis(3) talks about NUL terminated strings, whereas
almost other sources (including e.g. strlcat(3), strtok(3), strpbrk(3))
talk about NUL-terminated strings (i.e. with a hyphen.)
The following patch fixes this.
Joachim
Index: vis.3
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:03:42 +0059 Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk
wrote:
- it should be an mpe device, not a mpe device (i'll fix the one
in mpe.4)
The determining factor for the correct use of the indefinite articles
a and an is based on pronunciation. If the word starts with a
classic
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:34 PM, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org
wrote:
Personally, I favor brevity to avoid the issue entirely.
The most important question is, if nit-pickery like this even matters?
I really think not. We pick a or an and live with it. I think your
contortions to
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:34:00AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:03:42 +0059 Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk
wrote:
- it should be an mpe device, not a mpe device (i'll fix the one
in mpe.4)
The determining factor for the correct use of the indefinite articles
a
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 02:11:04PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
The man pages seem to prefer prose and complete sentences over fact
dumps. So do I. I think fragments impair the flow of the text.
i agree. let's try to make the english flow... we are not texting here.
jmc
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:59:46 -0400 Brad b...@comstyle.com wrote:
Which ones should people tests?
The bge(4), msk(4), ne(4) and ep(4) diffs.
bge(4) and msk(4) I have and have tested those respective diffs.
I have no ne(4) or ep(4) hardware, the changes are mechanical but
still need
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 02:52:45PM -0400, Paul Janzen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:53:41PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
I noticed that vis(3) talks about NUL terminated strings, whereas
almost other sources (including e.g. strlcat(3), strtok(3), strpbrk(3))
talk about NUL-terminated
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:53:41PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
I noticed that vis(3) talks about NUL terminated strings, whereas
almost other sources (including e.g. strlcat(3), strtok(3), strpbrk(3))
talk about
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 02:58:50PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
I see no reason to prefer hyphenated, but I'm modern like that.
Wikipedia tells me that the Oxford dictionary deleted 16000 hyphens
recently.
especially where we invent new terms, there is a tendency to hyphenate.
i'm guilty of
The C standard says nothing at all about nul or NUL. '\0' is called
the null character. [Basically, the C standard is written in English
and uses English words to describe things.]
A2.5.2 of my copy of KR 2nd ed mentions the character NUL. The rest
of the book, I guess, has to be
Nobody spoken up for zero-terminated yet?
I'd say, rightly or wrongly, null-terminated (meaning the null
character) is much more common than NUL-terminated.
Also I think the bikeshed should be a nice blue ;-).
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:25:25PM -0400, Paul Janzen wrote:
The C standard says
13 matches
Mail list logo
