Reflex y SemiPro - Mejor precio del mercado

2011-04-06 Thread DigitalesNet
USD 898 Nikon D5000 Kit Caacute;mara digital reacute;flex de objetivos intercambiables / Sensor de imaacute;gen CMOS / Tamantilde;o

Re: traceroute TOS

2011-04-06 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
Thanks, useful(at least for me). On Apr 5, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011/04/05 16:51, Stuart Henderson wrote: if -t is used, display a notice when the TOS changes en-route. ok? oh, it's better with a (contrived) example: $ traceroute -nt 7 naiad traceroute to

Re: pmap prefer diff

2011-04-06 Thread Mark Kettenis
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:42:47 +0200 From: Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl Hi, So it turns out that my allocator is not capable of handling the pmap_prefer horror. This diff exports the actual parameters of pmap_prefer, so I can make the allocator deal with this intelligently. I

Re: pmap prefer diff

2011-04-06 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote: Hi, So it turns out that my allocator is not capable of handling the pmap_prefer horror. This diff exports the actual parameters of pmap_prefer, so I can make the allocator deal with this intelligently. I need compile

Re: no really, be quiet mode for ping{,6}

2011-04-06 Thread David Vasek
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Peter Hessler wrote: Sometimes I want ping to be quiet. Not quiet in the only show me headers way that the original author thought was cute, but in the don't show me anything way, so cron doesn't spam me with useless crap. So, in honor of that, here is a patch to add -Q to

Re: no really, be quiet mode for ping{,6}

2011-04-06 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2011 Apr 06 (Wed) at 12:47:40 +0200 (+0200), David Vasek wrote: :On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Peter Hessler wrote: : :Sometimes I want ping to be quiet. Not quiet in the only show me :headers way that the original author thought was cute, but in the :don't show me anything way, so cron doesn't spam me

Re: no really, be quiet mode for ping{,6}

2011-04-06 Thread Benny Lofgren
On 2011-04-06 13.00, Peter Hessler wrote: On 2011 Apr 06 (Wed) at 12:47:40 +0200 (+0200), David Vasek wrote: :On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Peter Hessler wrote: :Sometimes I want ping to be quiet. Not quiet in the only show me :headers way that the original author thought was cute, but in the :don't

Re: traceroute TOS

2011-04-06 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:57:30PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011/04/05 16:51, Stuart Henderson wrote: if -t is used, display a notice when the TOS changes en-route. ok? oh, it's better with a (contrived) example: $ traceroute -nt 7 naiad traceroute to naiad.spacehopper.org

Re: traceroute TOS

2011-04-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/04/06 13:35, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:57:30PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011/04/05 16:51, Stuart Henderson wrote: if -t is used, display a notice when the TOS changes en-route. ok? oh, it's better with a (contrived) example: $ traceroute

Re: pmap prefer diff

2011-04-06 Thread Ariane van der Steldt
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:31:14AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:42:47 +0200 From: Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl So it turns out that my allocator is not capable of handling the pmap_prefer horror. This diff exports the actual parameters of pmap_prefer, so I

rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Piotr Sikora
Hello, attached patch adds daemon(ok/failed) output to the reload command. I believe it's extremely useful, since daemon's stderr is suppressed by rc_do. Best regards, Piotr Sikora piotr.sik...@frickle.com Index: rc.subr === RCS

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011, Piotr Sikora wrote: Hello, attached patch adds daemon(ok/failed) output to the reload command. I believe it's extremely useful, since daemon's stderr is suppressed by rc_do. No, this was left out on purpose. If you want to see stderr, use RC_DEBUG. Best regards,

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Piotr Sikora
Hi, No, this was left out on purpose. If you want to see stderr, use RC_DEBUG. But this patch doesn't bring back stderr, it just prints daemon(ok/failed). This is already present in start, restart and stop commands, why should reload be any different? Best regards, Piotr Sikora

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/04/03 18:04, Piotr Sikora wrote: Hello, attached patch adds daemon(ok/failed) output to the reload command. I believe it's extremely useful, since daemon's stderr is suppressed by rc_do. This doesn't usually indicate that the reload was successful, just that you were able to send

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Piotr Sikora wrote: Hi, No, this was left out on purpose. If you want to see stderr, use RC_DEBUG. But this patch doesn't bring back stderr, it just prints daemon(ok/failed). Ok but in your former mail you said since daemon's stderr is suppressed So if you're

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Piotr Sikora
Hi, This doesn't usually indicate that the reload was successful, just that you were able to send the process a SIGHUP. As such I think printing ok here gives a false sense of security. Yes and no... Some daemons, like nginx, have custom rc_reload command that actually does useful stuff and

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Piotr Sikora
Hi, Ok but in your former mail you said since daemon's stderr is suppressed So if you're looking for stderr, use RC_DEBUG. What I meant is that since stderr is suppressed (we don't print daemon's output), printing deamon(ok/failed) is the next best thing we can do to inform users that

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Piotr Sikora wrote: Hi, Ok but in your former mail you said since daemon's stderr is suppressed So if you're looking for stderr, use RC_DEBUG. What I meant is that since stderr is suppressed (we don't print daemon's output), printing deamon(ok/failed) is the

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Piotr Sikora wrote: Hi, Because it is next to impossible to get a correct return. By default, all we can check is that SIGHUP was successfull or not, that's it. Yes, but there are 8 ports that have custom rc_reload logic. What does this have to do with

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/04/06 15:09, Piotr Sikora wrote: Hi, Because it is next to impossible to get a correct return. By default, all we can check is that SIGHUP was successfull or not, that's it. Yes, but there are 8 ports that have custom rc_reload logic. What does this have to do with

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011/04/06 15:09, Piotr Sikora wrote: Hi, Because it is next to impossible to get a correct return. By default, all we can check is that SIGHUP was successfull or not, that's it. Yes, but there are 8 ports that have custom

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Piotr Sikora
Hi, Otherwise you can end up with foobar(ok) when in fact the daemon failed to reload. We're ending up with $? = 0 from reload command anyway. daemon(ok/failed) is only visual representation of that. So we have to choose between hundreds of daemons that are using the default or 8 that are

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Piotr Sikora wrote: Hi, Otherwise you can end up with foobar(ok) when in fact the daemon failed to reload. We're ending up with $? = 0 from reload command anyway. daemon(ok/failed) is only visual representation of that. Exactly. But when I see a visual

Re: rc.subr: print result of the reload command

2011-04-06 Thread Piotr Sikora
Hi, What about custom RC_RELOAD_OUTPUT variable that would print result for ports with custom logic? Would that work for you? I would like to prevent adding knobs when at all possible. To be honest, I kind of agree. Last try: What about printing only foobar(failed)? By definition, it

Re: pmap prefer diff

2011-04-06 Thread Mark Kettenis
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:15:50 +0200 From: Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:31:14AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:42:47 +0200 From: Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl So it turns out that my allocator is not capable of

Summary of junk emails blocked - 1 Junk Emails Blocked

2011-04-06 Thread Admin Junk Summary
Junk Box Summary for: tech@openbsd.org The 1 emails listed below have been placed in your personal Junk Box since your last Junk Box Summary and will be deleted after 1 days. To retrieve any of these messages, visit your Junk Box at: http://192.168.1.253:10080 Login using your standard

Merge viapm and viaenv drivers

2011-04-06 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
Hi! Merge viapm and viaenv Pluse: - Add support SMBus for VT82C596, VT82C596B, VT82C686A, VT8231 - Add support ACPI timer for all VIA South Bridges Tested on: - VT82C596B (Gigabyte GA-6VXE7+) - VT82C686A (Neoware CA2) - VT8231 (HP T5700) - VT8235 (Neoware CA10) OK? -- Alexandr Shadchin

Re: no really, be quiet mode for ping{,6}

2011-04-06 Thread Andres Perera
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Peter Hessler phess...@openbsd.org wrote: On 2011 Apr 06 (Wed) at 12:47:40 +0200 (+0200), David Vasek wrote: :On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Peter Hessler wrote: : :Sometimes I want ping to be quiet. B Not quiet in the only show me :headers way that the original author

Re: no really, be quiet mode for ping{,6}

2011-04-06 Thread Ted Unangst
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Peter Hessler phess...@openbsd.org wrote: I use silent ping very often (especially in scripts and cronjobs), and it pisses me off that I need to redirect to /dev/null. I'm scratching an itch, here. Sorry, I think I'm with the haters here. Quiet flags are for

Re: vnds considerd harmful.

2011-04-06 Thread Jonathan Thornburg
In http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=130200205608892w=1, Thordur Bjornsson thib () openbsd ! org wrote: Now that I've disallowed swapping to vnd's the purpose of vnd (vs svnd) is suspect, it serves no purpose other then providing a different way of doing what svnd does (which imo, isn't

if_ath oerrors with multicast traffic

2011-04-06 Thread Stefan Sperling
There is a correlation between netstat -I ath0 showing more Oerrs and multicast packets (e.g. CARP) leaving the interface. There is no apparent real problem since these frames are received just fine at the other end. The diff below stops the driver from doing this. Is this right? BTW, there

Upgrade i386 to amd64

2011-04-06 Thread Steven R. Gerber
Ran the upgrade from CD. Want to be sure that packages are OK. Is pkg_add -u sufficient? (It looks like nothing changed.) Thanks, Steven

Re: Upgrade i386 to amd64

2011-04-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/04/06 18:36, Steven R. Gerber wrote: Ran the upgrade from CD. Want to be sure that packages are OK. Is pkg_add -u sufficient? (It looks like nothing changed.) No, remove old packages and re-add them: pkg_info -q ~/pkglist pkg_delete /var/db/pkg/{.*,*} pkg_add -zl ~/pkglist Reply-To

Re: Upgrade i386 to amd64

2011-04-06 Thread olli hauer
On 2011-04-07 00:36, Steven R. Gerber wrote: Ran the upgrade from CD. Want to be sure that packages are OK. Is pkg_add -u sufficient? (It looks like nothing changed.) Thanks, Steven What about all the *.db files? They are incompatible between i368 and amd64 (/etc/(pwd|spwd).db,

Re: no really, be quiet mode for ping{,6}

2011-04-06 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 03:19:00PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Peter Hessler phess...@openbsd.org wrote: I use silent ping very often (especially in scripts and cronjobs), and it pisses me off that I need to redirect to /dev/null. I'm scratching an itch, here.

Comprar en China y Asia

2011-04-06 Thread patri
Estimado/a Sr./a., Como brokers con experiencia en */importaciC3n o fabricaciC3n /*desde China, Asia y otros paises desde 1991, podemos ofrecerle 4 servicios basicos */en temas de importaciC3n o fabricacion:/* *Si aun no compra en Asia: * *COMPRAMOS PARA SU EMPRESA EN CHINA Y ASIA

Re: Upgrade i386 to amd64

2011-04-06 Thread Ted Unangst
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Steven R. Gerber sger...@gerber-systems.com wrote: Ran the upgrade from CD. Want to be sure that packages are OK. Is pkg_add -u sufficient? (It looks like nothing changed.) Upgrading like that is not supposed to work. Upgrades do not replace the contents of

lrint fix

2011-04-06 Thread Martynas Venckus
Our lrint, llrint, lrintf, llrintf always return 0 for inputs close to 0. However, depending on the rounding mode, they should actually return -1 or 1. Here's my test case: #include ieeefp.h #include math.h #include stdio.h int main(void) { fpsetround(FP_RM); printf(%ld\n,

Re: rthreads: fix sharing of signal stacks and actions

2011-04-06 Thread Brad
On 06/04/11 9:34 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: Signal stacks are supposed to be per-thread, but they're currently in the shared sigacts structure, so move them to struct proc. The SAS_ALTSTACK flag can go away completely: it was always the inverse of the SS_DISABLE flag on the sigstk, so just use