Revisiting this following some recent discussions on another
mailing list,
On 2010/09/23 15:13, Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
there's nothing special about this driver. as it does usual iic_exec's,
i'm not sure what can be actually
On 05/18/11 23:31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
set skip in PF has a slightly unexpected behaviour; rather
than skipping by interface group, it matches on the non-numeric
part of an interface name.
I think the prefix match test is a common behaviour so I think you
should keep that. Example granti
On 2011/05/19 10:22, Alexander Hall wrote:
Hmmm, looking further, it seems ordinary rules only match on the
interface name or group as well (in pfi_kif_match()), so maybe
you're just plain right after all. :-)
Yes, this is the main problem imo. Current 'set skip' handling
pre-dates interface
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:22:07AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
On 05/18/11 23:31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
set skip in PF has a slightly unexpected behaviour; rather
than skipping by interface group, it matches on the non-numeric
part of an interface name.
I think the prefix match test
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:26:59AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
To be honest I'm not sure who will do a 'set skip on sis' or
'set skip on em'.
I would ;-)
Sometimes you have machines with different types of physical
interfaces where one type is used for internal stuff like a dedicated
pfsync or
On 2011/05/19 11:26, Claudio Jeker wrote:
There is a bigger problem with 'set skip on lo', it is only evaluated
during load. So if you create a lo1 afterwards the set skip will not
trigger. This is very annoying especially with qemu and tun interfaces.
Right, I noticed this during testing, and
On 05/19/11 11:43, Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:26:59AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
To be honest I'm not sure who will do a 'set skip on sis' or
'set skip on em'.
I would ;-)
You would, however, not have a big problem adding 'group em' to the
corresponding
On 2010/09/23 15:13, Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
there's nothing special about this driver. as it does usual iic_exec's,
i'm not sure what can be actually fixed there. so if nobody has any
idea what could be done about it, you
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 03:32:10 +0200
From: Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl
Hi,
I would respond in-thread, but I can't find the thread that had the
original report that emacs-22 doesn't work under vmmap. Perhaps it was
only on icb...
Anyways, emacs-22.3p8 doesn't work under
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:43:54AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:26:59AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
To be honest I'm not sure who will do a 'set skip on sis' or
'set skip on em'.
I would ;-)
... but you don't at the moment.
Sometimes you have machines with
Here's a diff to make script(1) read input from a file when -i flag is
used (and fallback to stdin when file is out of data).
Can be used to emulate user input for interactive programs.
(here we do tab completion)
[/tmp]% cat test
ls mutt--- two tabs here
exit
[/tmp]% script -i
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:13:37PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 03:32:10 +0200
From: Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl
I would respond in-thread, but I can't find the thread that had the
original report that emacs-22 doesn't work under vmmap. Perhaps it was
Add AVL tree implementation and merge few RB tree related macros.
If you have comments or any claims, please send me feedback
and I will fix them.
--
M.Punov
-
AITNET - Sofia/Bulgaria -
Software Network Solutions
(+359) 888 73 73 58;(+359) 2 402 4000
[demime 1.01d
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:52:44PM +0300, Michael Pounov wrote:
Add AVL tree implementation and merge few RB tree related macros.
If you have comments or any claims, please send me feedback
and I will fix them.
cool. but tech@ removes attachments, send your diffs inline.
I'm assuming you
Theo de Raadt wrote:
On 2010/09/23 15:13, Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
there's nothing special about this driver. as it does usual
iic_exec's,
i'm not sure what can be actually fixed there. so if nobody has any
idea what
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:52:44PM +0300, Michael Pounov wrote:
Add AVL tree implementation and merge few RB tree related macros.
If you have comments or any claims, please send me feedback
and I will fix them.
First of all, before we get anto any technical discussion etc. please
provide
Add AVL tree implementation and merge few RB tree related macros.
If you have comments or any claims, please send me feedback
and I will fix them.
Include patch file
--
M.Punov
-
AITNET - Sofia/Bulgaria -
Software Network Solutions
(+359) 888 73 73 58;(+359) 2 402 4000
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Thordur Bjornsson t...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:52:44PM +0300, Michael Pounov wrote:
Add AVL tree implementation and merge few RB tree related macros.
If you have comments or any claims, please send me feedback
and I will fix them.
cool.
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 08:16:22PM +0300, Michael Pounov wrote:
Add AVL tree implementation and merge few RB tree related macros.
If you have comments or any claims, please send me feedback
and I will fix them.
Include patch file
--
M.Punov
-
AITNET -
Not see differences in results with performance from RB tree vs AVL,
but right solution for problems when we have choice between algorithms.
On Thu, 19 May 2011 19:21:21 +0200
Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Thordur Bjornsson t...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:21:21PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Thordur Bjornsson t...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:52:44PM +0300, Michael Pounov wrote:
Add AVL tree implementation and merge few RB tree related macros.
If you have comments
Add AVL tree implementation and merge few RB tree related macros.
If you have comments or any claims, please send me feedback
and I will fix them.
Inline patch::
--- /usr/src/sys/sys/tree.h Mon Mar 2 11:42:55 2009
+++ tree.h Thu May 19 20:16:36 2011
@@ -730,9 +730,367 @@
AVL implementation consume less memory from RB tree implementation
On Thu, 19 May 2011 19:33:22 +0200
Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Michael Pounov mi...@aitbg.com wrote:
Not see differences in results with performance from RB tree vs AVL,
but
The following diff changes the OpenBSD/loongson console device selection
from an `either serial or glass console, depending on the value of
environment variables in pmon' to `glass console if there is a graphics
card, otherwise serial if there are serial ports, and prefer serial if
environment
pEstimado/a tech@openbsd.org/p
pPor medio de la presente le enviamos las novedades del mes. Ingrese en el
siguiente link:/p
phttp://www.cuerosliberty.com.ar/newsletter/mayo1102.htm/p
pAnte cualquier consulta no dude en contactarnos./p
pUn cordial saludo./p
pCueros Libertybr /
Reconquista 573,
On 2011/05/19 20:13, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
On 2010/09/23 15:13, Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
there's nothing special about this driver. as it does usual
iic_exec's,
i'm not sure what can be actually
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 21:26, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2011/05/19 20:13, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
On 2010/09/23 15:13, Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
there's nothing special about this
Hello all.
This patch allows ipsecctl-like flow grouping along with current
behavior. It allows to write many-to-many policies in a more
compact way, see an example:
ikev2 esp \
from { 1.2.3.4, 5.6.7.8 } to { 3.4.5.6, 4.5.6.7} \
from 7.8.9.0 to { 0.1.2.3, 2.3.4.5 } \
...
will
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 05:27:01PM +, Thordur Bjornsson wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:21:21PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Thordur Bjornsson t...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:52:44PM +0300, Michael Pounov wrote:
Add AVL tree
Adds support for family 10h/11h AMD processors, not sure if it's the best way
to do this.. but it works and noticably lowers the temperatures reported by the
die sensors.
# sysctl hw.setperf=0
# echo apmd_flags=\-C\ /etc/rc.conf.local
Just putting it here again for testing, could also be
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 09:16:39 -0500 (CDT)
From: L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net
To: tech@openbsd.org
Subject: nfe driver
Message-ID: pine.bso.4.53.1105180913130.1...@mail.omnitec.net
Just upgraded a machine to AMD64, .. and the MB has an NVIDIA nForce MCP
ethernet onboard. Unfortunately, the
Here it is a again with the magic relocated to piixreg.h.
To clarify, if you have:
piixpm0 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 ATI SBx00 SMBus
Then check if the revision is = 0x40, which is the relevant southbridge.
If it works, you'll see pretty stuff like this::
spdmem0 at iic addr 0x50: 2GB DDR3 SDRAM
Claudio wrote:
Since my new amd64 runs i386 at the moment I ported the code over.
Cool, thanks.
According to md5 -tt it seems to work.
:-)
-Bryan.
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:33:22PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Michael Pounov mi...@aitbg.com wrote:
Not see differences in results with performance from RB tree vs AVL,
Which tree size did you use to test that? Which insert order (yes, this
is relevant: with
34 matches
Mail list logo
