On Fri, Nov 18, 2011, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
>> What is the line between sysctl vs globals ?
>>
>
> Checking again, it makes sense having the sysctl IMHO.
> We have something very similar in kern.forkstat, kern.nchstats, and
> the protocol stats.
I think those stats are useful for a sysa
On 18 November 2011 00:59, Christiano F. Haesbaert
wrote:
> On 17 November 2011 23:39, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011, Thordur Bjornsson wrote:
>>> On 2011 Nov 17 (Thu) at 21:18:24 -0200 (-0200), Christiano F. Haesbaert
>>> wrote:
Moving this to tech@
Hi,
I wa
On 17 November 2011 23:39, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011, Thordur Bjornsson wrote:
>> On 2011 Nov 17 (Thu) at 21:18:24 -0200 (-0200), Christiano F. Haesbaert
>> wrote:
>>> Moving this to tech@
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was studying the scheduler code after watching tedu's talk, I'd like
>>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011, Thordur Bjornsson wrote:
> On 2011 Nov 17 (Thu) at 21:18:24 -0200 (-0200), Christiano F. Haesbaert
> wrote:
>> Moving this to tech@
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was studying the scheduler code after watching tedu's talk, I'd like
>> to expose this statistics to userland so that I can try
On 2011 Nov 17 (Thu) at 21:18:24 -0200 (-0200), Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> Moving this to tech@
>
> Hi,
>
> I was studying the scheduler code after watching tedu's talk, I'd like
> to expose this statistics to userland so that I can try playing with
> cache affinity in the future:
>
> giml
Moving this to tech@
Hi,
I was studying the scheduler code after watching tedu's talk, I'd like
to expose this statistics to userland so that I can try playing with
cache affinity in the future:
gimli:src: sysctl kern.schedstat
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:48:36PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
> Hi tech,
>
> I have a simple diff for ksh(1) which takes
> care to not read past the end of the static
> buffer 'holdbuf' where the length of 'pat'
> is greater than the buffer.
>
holdbuf is zero-terminated, so strcmp() wo
Sure, looks good, I'll use your version.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 02:00:51PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:09:08PM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > libedit miscalculates the amount of space needed for constructing it's
> > wchar_t version of argv, causin
Christian Weisgerber wrote and mailed:
> Janjaap van Velthooven wrote:
>
> > For some obscure reason this gave successes. After splitting up
> > alpha/rtld_machine.c into 2 or mor parts, any combination where the
> > 1st and the 3rd function (_dl_md_reloc and _dl_md_reloc_got) were
> > not in the
Janjaap van Velthooven wrote:
> For some obscure reason this gave successes. After splitting up
> alpha/rtld_machine.c into 2 or mor parts, any combination where the
> 1st and the 3rd function (_dl_md_reloc and _dl_md_reloc_got) were
> not in the same source allowed the split-up sources to be com
Hi,
this diff was already suggested by matthew@ some time ago. It renders
clang++ usable with gcc's C++ include files, see:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=130229126704450&w=2
I don't expect any fallout, but just to be sure, can this go through a
bulk build on affected platforms (gcc4)?
In
Hi tech,
I have a simple diff for ksh(1) which takes
care to not read past the end of the static
buffer 'holdbuf' where the length of 'pat'
is greater than the buffer.
Does anyone think this is worthwhile? If not,
should we remove the XXX comment altogether?
- Michael
Index: vi.c
=
As you know the world's biggest branding revolution starts January 2012.
What direct implications does it have for your organization? What do your
teams need to know now and what must they be prepared for in advance to face
the tidal wave?
This White Paper provides an in-depth overview and can b
13 matches
Mail list logo
