* Miod Vallat [2012-02-09 18:15]:
> Could people with ahc(4) SCSI controllers give the following diff a try
> and report whether this causes any difference in behaviour? This diff
> seems to do wonders on alpha, but I'd like reports from other platforms
> (such as i386, amd64 and macppc) before co
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 01:04:52AM +, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> For some stupid reason the x driver is still trying to submit commands
> to the gpu while vt switched (this is verboten, and returns with EBUSY).
> What are you running in X at the time? I can't reproduce this issue to
> try and fix
Hi,
I have just upgraded from a thinkpad x60s to an x61s.
The machine came with an iwn wireless card (no suprise really).
After installing the firmware with fw_update, you can start using the
card but very shortly start to see firmware errors. Once I managed to
get an address via DHCP, but that
Reads fine to me, any objections ?
jmc ?
On 10 February 2012 03:50, Lawrence Teo wrote:
> This diff fixes several man pages that have incorrect document titles
> (.Dt).
>
> Lawrence
>
>
> Index: src/bin/md5/sha256.1
> ===
> RCS file
Hi Christiano,
Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote on Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:26:18AM -0200:
> Reads fine to me, any objections ?
That's OK schwarze@, but don't forget that the tree is locked
and you need an OK deraadt@ as well.
Yours,
Ingo
>> Index: src/bin/md5/sha256.1
>> ==
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:26:18AM -0200, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> Reads fine to me, any objections ?
>
> jmc ?
>
i had just filed this under "look at after lock", but if you want to
take it on, that's fine.
note there is no rpcauth function, so that page should probably be renamed
(to
Hi Owain,
>
>From a look at the kernel code and a look at your X log it looks like
>this spamming is happening only while you are vt switched away from X.
>
correct. another symptom is that xorg _does_not_ refresh the screen.
this is why I inadvertently duplicated dmesg and Xorg.0.log.
>(you use
> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:23:04 +
> From: Stuart Henderson
>
> *obviously* this is not for now (it hasn't even gone through a mkr
> yet and I haven't touched the manpage). but I was interested to see
> what the speed difference was like (answer: small improvement only)
> and since I'd done i
> > Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:23:04 +
> > From: Stuart Henderson
> >
> > *obviously* this is not for now (it hasn't even gone through a mkr
> > yet and I haven't touched the manpage). but I was interested to see
> > what the speed difference was like (answer: small improvement only)
> > and si