On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:03:41PM +0200, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> there is code in ether_output() that handles the case that we have to
> use a gateway to send the packet. This code does a lookup for the route
> required to reach the gateway.
>
> In case there is a gateway for whi
looking at sbcheckreserve and sbchecklowmem in
> src/sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c.
>
> What does sbchecklowmem() return if between the two limits? (Can that
> condition occur?)
>
> My vmstat -m output is at
> http://git.bind10.isc.org/~jreed/vmstat.out.20120625.txt
>
>
uipc_socket2.c.
What does sbchecklowmem() return if between the two limits? (Can that
condition occur?)
My vmstat -m output is at
http://git.bind10.isc.org/~jreed/vmstat.out.20120625.txt
Do you have any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this further? The
system as of now has not been rebooted,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:47:18PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Like, who cares about about commit id's.
>
> Projects are just people working together. A project didn't come up
> with that diff. A person did.
>
> When we say where something came from, we do it by giving credit, not
> by refere
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:12:52PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > This is a little meta, but if we're going to start pulling changes from
> > bitrig, I don't think "commit 171e1f9d" is the attribution style we
> > should use.
>
> It seems that that the branch I took these from is rebased and thus
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:12:52PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> This is a little meta, but if we're going to start pulling changes from
> bitrig, I don't think "commit 171e1f9d" is the attribution style we
> should use.
It seems that that the branch I took these from is rebased and thus the
commit
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 20:54, Arto Jonsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a couple of >= 0 comparisons on unsigned integers. These refer to Bitrig
> commits 171e1f9d and 72337965 respectively.
This is a little meta, but if we're going to start pulling changes from
bitrig, I don't think "commit 171e1f9d" is th
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:23:44PM +0100, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> In place of
> else if (powerlevel >= 30 && powerlevel < 60)
> could use
> else if (powerlevel < 60)
>
Thanks. Updated patch below.
Index: sys/arch/amd64/amd64/machdep.c
===
On 06/25/12 18:54, Arto Jonsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a couple of >= 0 comparisons on unsigned integers. These refer to Bitrig
> commits 171e1f9d and 72337965 respectively.
>
> Index: sys/arch/amd64/amd64/machdep.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/
Hi,
a couple of >= 0 comparisons on unsigned integers. These refer to Bitrig
commits 171e1f9d and 72337965 respectively.
Index: sys/arch/amd64/amd64/machdep.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/machdep.c,v
retrieving revisio
Hi,
the exit status of a shell pipeline is the exit status of the last
command in the pipeline. Since mkdep(1) pipes the output of ${CC} into
sed(1), the following check of '$?' checks the exit status of sed(1)
and not the of of cc(1).
This is nasty if some modification broke the compilation of
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:23:05PM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:09:33AM +0300, dsp wrote:
> > We observe the following behaviour when running nc -ul.
> > The server begins on a recvfrom() and when data arrives it
> > connects() the socket.
> > When the client die
12 matches
Mail list logo
