On 15/08/14(Fri) 10:43, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org [2014-08-15 10:29]:
On 2014/08/12 15:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
I find arp(8) output really difficult to read, but more importantly it
does not print the expire time of non permanent entries like ndp(8).
* Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org [2014-08-18 11:03]:
On 15/08/14(Fri) 10:43, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org [2014-08-15 10:29]:
On 2014/08/12 15:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
I find arp(8) output really difficult to read, but more importantly it
does
first step is to unlink crypto(4) pseudo device from the architecture
dependant character device tables and kernel config files.
OK?
diff --git sys/arch/alpha/alpha/conf.c sys/arch/alpha/alpha/conf.c
index 83cea34..7d103af 100644
--- sys/arch/alpha/alpha/conf.c
+++ sys/arch/alpha/alpha/conf.c
@@
this removes /dev/crypto device interface and public key functionality
that is only usable via /dev/crypto.
OK?
diff --git sys/conf/files sys/conf/files
index 3941639..9af78cc 100644
--- sys/conf/files
+++ sys/conf/files
@@ -870,11 +870,10 @@ file crypto/blf.c (inet ipsec) |
please note that the commented out example usage in etc/MAKEDEV.common
remains till someone feels the need to change it.
OK?
diff --git etc/MAKEDEV.common etc/MAKEDEV.common
index bfcd943..b656d46 100644
--- etc/MAKEDEV.common
+++ etc/MAKEDEV.common
@@ -131,11 +131,10 @@ target(all, wd, 0, 1, 2,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 16:03 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
this removes /dev/crypto device interface and public key functionality
that is only usable via /dev/crypto.
OK?
minor correction: preserve #ifdef _KERNEL in the cryptodev.h. while
there are no userland programs including it atm
I don't know if we recycle them somehow, but just in case...
diff --git sys/sys/file.h sys/sys/file.h
index d98118e..64c0f31 100644
--- sys/sys/file.h
+++ sys/sys/file.h
@@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ struct file {
short f_flag; /* see fcntl.h */
#defineDTYPE_VNODE 1 /*
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 06:45:54PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 02:56:25PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
Ping?
Hi tech,
during my search after other xfree() implementations, I saw
that xfree() in sndiod is just a wrapper for free() without any
other
Index: Dependencies.pm
===
--- src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/Dependencies.pm ()
+++ src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/Dependencies.pm ()
@@ -384,6 +384,7 @@
for my $package ($self-{set}-newer, $self-{set}-kept) {
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:47 PM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Index: Dependencies.pm
===
--- src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/Dependencies.pm ()
+++ src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/Dependencies.pm ()
@@ -384,6
Your bug report is incomplete and I can't replicate it here, do you have
any more information about what happens?
This is how it looks to me ..
$ sudo pkg_add -v p5-Net-SMTP-SSL
Update candidates: quirks-2.9 - quirks-2.9 (ok)
quirks-2.9 signed on 2014-07-31T22:37:55Z
No change in quirks-2.9
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote:
Your bug report is incomplete and I can't replicate it here, do you have
any more information about what happens?
well it is not standard build, i have build a patch release and then i
chroot into it to build package.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:01:15PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
i think i'll try to find the sk at work and wire it up. its just annoying cos
im pretty sure its sr optics with sc connectors.
thanks for testing.
how's this one?
Index: if_sk.c
On 18/08/14 6:24 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:01:15PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
i think i'll try to find the sk at work and wire it up. its just annoying cos
im pretty sure its sr optics with sc connectors.
thanks for testing.
how's this one?
I'll look into testing
Cool, thanks.
On 19/08/2014 8:42 am, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 18/08/14 6:24 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:01:15PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
i think i'll try to find the sk at work and wire it up. its just
annoying cos im pretty sure its sr optics with sc
Hi,
I have added functionality that allows syslogd to receive and send
UDP packets via inet6 sockets.
I will split this diff into smaller parts to make review and
discussion easier.
bluhm
Index: usr.sbin/syslogd/privsep.c
===
RCS
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:59:42AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
I will split this diff into smaller parts to make review and
discussion easier.
Let's start with the easy part, fix trailing white spaces.
ok?
bluhm
Index: usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:59:42AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
I will split this diff into smaller parts to make review and
discussion easier.
Replace manually written function names with __func__. This
will make renaming functions easier.
ok?
bluhm
Index: usr.sbin/syslogd/privsep.c
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:59:42AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
I will split this diff into smaller parts to make review and
discussion easier.
The exit codes in privsep.c seem to be the wrong way around. Fatal
errors should exit with 1, and regular shutdown should result in
exit with 0. I
this attempts to replace to custom jumbo allocator in ti(4) with
MCLGETI. it does not implement struct if_rxring, it just changes
where the memory comes from.
can someone test this for me?
Index: ti.c
===
RCS file:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:24 PM, David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:01:15PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
i think i'll try to find the sk at work and wire it up. its just annoying
cos im pretty sure its sr optics with sc connectors.
thanks for testing.
how's
the jumbo rx stuff wasnt run (look for notyet in the diff), so it's
all just dead code. i dont care enough to try and fix it without
access to or a use for the hardware, so id rather just remove it
and save the bytes in the kernel.
can anyone test to make sure i havent broken existing use?
dlg
i dont have the hardware, can anyone test?
Index: if_lge.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_lge.c,v
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -p -r1.62 if_lge.c
--- if_lge.c22 Jul 2014 13:12:11 - 1.62
+++ if_lge.c19 Aug
i dont have the hardware, can anyone test?
dlg
Index: if_nge.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_nge.c,v
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -p -r1.79 if_nge.c
--- if_nge.c22 Jul 2014 13:12:11 - 1.79
+++ if_nge.c19
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for working on this. You will probably get a more thorough review
once folks start coming back from summer vacation, but here is my initial
take:
The coding style looks good. There are a few #if 0's that probably don't
need to be there, but that's minor.
The regress tests
someone already sent me one to test with (hence the diff) at the same time as
one of the guys at work found an old fibre one here and wired it up for me.
i think i have enough of them now, but thank you for the offer.
cheers,
dlg
On 19 Aug 2014, at 11:17, David Higgs hig...@gmail.com wrote:
26 matches
Mail list logo