FIFO fd not marked readable after EOF

Hi everyone, I am using select(2) on a FIFO fd and monitoring for readability. select(2) doesn't return after the writer exits. The same piece of code marks the fd as readable on Linux. Not sure which behaviour is correct though. Doing a very similar test with stdin and closing it before the ca

Re: FIFO fd not marked readable after EOF

On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 01:08:57PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > The same piece of code marks the fd as readable on Linux. I tested on NetBSD and it also seems to mark the fd readable. > Doing a very similar test with stdin and closing it before > the call to select(2) behaves as expected a

Re: [patch]lock and unlock like GnuRCS

I think that GNU RCS segfaulting for -u -l is enough justification to do what we like, so a message (and last flag wins) like -L/-U would be fine with me. But if we want to do what they probably "meant" to happen then better to match -l -u like Fritjof's diff. On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 12:55:35PM

re(4) mtu >1500

Does anyone have an idea of what's needed for working jumbos on the RL_FLAG_JUMBOV2 variants of re(4) where they're currently disabled? These seem to account for most of the chips seen in hardware designs from the last couple of years (including APU and some others). if ((sc->rl_flags & RL

Re: re(4) mtu >1500

Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote: > Does anyone have an idea of what's needed for working jumbos on the > RL_FLAG_JUMBOV2 variants of re(4) where they're currently disabled? > These seem to account for most of the chips seen in hardware > designs from the last couple of years (includin

[patch] rcs: stored values never read

Hi tech, according to scan-build(1) there are a few "never read" values. fritjof Index: co.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/co.c,v retrieving revision 1.118 diff -u -p -r1.118 co.c --- co.c2 Oct 2014 06:23:15 -

Re: FIFO fd not marked readable after EOF

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > I am using select(2) on a FIFO fd and monitoring > for readability. select(2) doesn't return after the writer > exits. > > The same piece of code marks the fd as readable on Linux. > Not sure which behaviour is correct though. The Linu

Re: Speeding up openbsd on amd64 MP - patch 2/2

This is now in -current. If anyone notices problems, give noise. Cheers, Stefan

Re: FIFO fd not marked readable after EOF

The following diff should fix it. - todd Index: sys/miscfs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/openbsd/src/sys/miscfs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c,v retrieving revision 1.41 diff -u -r1.41 fifo_vnops.c --- sys/miscfs/fifofs/fifo_vnop