On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:05:27AM -0500, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
Hello,
Finally found some free time.
What would you think of making the Which disk is the root disk?
question default to the first softraid device you have configured,
if any.
The thinking is if you bothered to
On 2014/11/26 03:05, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
What would you think of making the Which disk is the root disk?
question default to the first softraid device you have configured,
if any.
softraid isn't the only place where the guessed value is incorrect;
if the information can be made
Hi,
turns out that there are a few more bad savestr calls even inside of pch.c.
Some of the code pathes are quite obvious that a NULL return value would
lead to a null pointer dereference, others would last longer before
dereferencing.
Carefully reviewing the savestr calls, the rule of thumb
Hello Florian,
On 26/11/14(Wed) 06:56, Florian Riehm wrote:
since OpenBSD 5.6 route change messages can change the interface of a route
(rt_ifa) even if a message doesn't seem to require it because of a changed
gateway or stuff like that.
I would like to ask if it's a regression or if the new
On 25/11/14(Tue) 15:16, Todd C. Miller wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:43:16 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Diff below removes the non-needed usages of struct route friends in
pf.c, any comment or ok?
You are missing some initializations of rt to NULL, comments inline.
Thanks for the
Hi Jean-Philippe,
Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote on Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:05:27AM -0500:
Finally found some free time.
What would you think of making the Which disk is the root disk?
question default to the first softraid device you have configured,
if any.
I don't like that.
The
It’s getting stuck in a reboot loop.
Not enough time to investigate at the moment, but I’ll dig into this soon.
It may be my build environment.
On Nov 25, 2014, at 5:54 AM, Jonathan Gray j...@jsg.id.au wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 08:12:33PM -0600, Edwin Amsler wrote:
Here are the changes
While debugging the recent route change regression I found various
bugs in the code handling IPv6 addresses. The most ugly one, because
it leaves you with a null ifp pointer in your routing table, is fixed
by the diff below.
Basically if you try to remove an address from an interface, by
On 26/11/14(Wed) 13:32, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 25/11/14(Tue) 15:16, Todd C. Miller wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:43:16 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Diff below removes the non-needed usages of struct route friends in
pf.c, any comment or ok?
You are missing some
HEllo,
So i reported a bug with a pci bridge a while ago. On an Apu with a
pci to pci bridge over pci express.
Dmesg below
I use a recent snapshot
OpenBSD 5.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #610: Tue Nov 25 06:00:07 MST 2014
and assume the commit was in
The situation improved, as i can have the card
From: sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:10:51 -0500
HEllo,
So i reported a bug with a pci bridge a while ago. On an Apu with a
pci to pci bridge over pci express.
Dmesg below
I use a recent snapshot
OpenBSD 5.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #610: Tue Nov 25
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:21:43 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
And know with the correct diff...
Looks good.
- todd
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 18:42 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 19:04 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
Hi,
IP header is not always aligned since bpf copies out the mbuf
chain into the contigous buffer provided by the userland. I've
seen this with large packet sizes on
More rdomain checks are needed to be able to use the same subnet
in a back to back connection between IPv6 rdomains as pointed out
by mpi@.
OK?
diff --git sys/netinet6/nd6.c sys/netinet6/nd6.c
index 9616187..d704cd6 100644
--- sys/netinet6/nd6.c
+++ sys/netinet6/nd6.c
@@ -1264,10 +1264,13 @@
Hi,
I hope this is the right mailing list for discussing this issue. I could
not find any information about a mailing list on libressl.org.
It currently looks like the libtls version does not set a list of secure
ciphers by default (e.g. that does not include MD5 or SHA-1).
Would it be a
Bertrand Janin wrote :
Philip Guenther wrote :
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Florian Obser flor...@openbsd.org wrote:
...
Since we are probably not supposed to send a Content-Type header I
think it makes sense to duplicate the httpmsg generating code in this
case;
If a GET
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:52:30 -0700 (MST) Antoine Jacoutot
ajacou...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvs
Module name: src
Changes by: ajacou...@cvs.openbsd.org 2014/11/26 08:52:30
Modified files:
usr.sbin/sysmerge: sysmerge.8 sysmerge.sh
Log message:
Drop
Last update, with Tobias's help.
The following diff
- changes MAXPATHLEN from sys/param.h to PATH_MAX from limits.h
- adds a missing prototype for sane_count
- locate.bigram and locate.code now abort when reading a pathname
exceeding PATH_MAX bytes on stdin
Index:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 09:48:15PM +0100, Nicolas Bedos wrote:
Last update, with Tobias's help.
The following diff
- changes MAXPATHLEN from sys/param.h to PATH_MAX from limits.h
- adds a missing prototype for sane_count
- locate.bigram and locate.code now abort when reading a pathname
19 matches
Mail list logo
