may just a naive question..
but did you sudo vipw
and put unbound class for unbound user?
/Bogdan
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 9:46 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net
wrote:
Hi,
So i have started using unbound on a mailserver (running amd64 5.6-stable).
First observation is that
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 09:04:52AM +, Bogdan Andu wrote:
may just a naive question..
but did you sudo vipw
and put unbound class for unbound user?
That's not neccesary anymore these days, I believe. The rc.d subsystem
takes case of setting the proper class, if available. At least it
may just a naive question..
but did you sudo vipw
and put unbound class for unbound user?
That's not neccesary anymore these days, I believe. The rc.d subsystem
takes case of setting the proper class, if available. At least it
That's correct.
does not document setting the login
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:21:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Alexey Suslikov alexey.susli...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:51:14 + (UTC)
Stefan Fritsch sf at sfritsch.de writes:
---
On 16.12.2014. 6:16, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 06:22:37PM +0100, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
Hi all,
I have got two new Dell R630 and have current on them from Sun Dec
14 15:07:17. Installation went great and very fast.
The problem is that I see around 11k interrupts on acpi0.
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:44:54 -0500
From: Lawrence Teo l...@openbsd.org
Make divert_output() do an m_pullup only if truly needed.
ok?
Questionable. AFAIK m_pullup(9) will only do the pullup if it is
necesary in the first place. Is there a measurable speedup from
inlining the check?
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:16:58 +1000
From: Jonathan Matthew jonat...@d14n.org
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 06:22:37PM +0100, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
Hi all,
I have got two new Dell R630 and have current on them from Sun Dec
14 15:07:17. Installation went great and very fast.
The problem
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:08:03AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:21:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Alexey Suslikov alexey.susli...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:51:14 + (UTC)
On 16 December 2014 at 12:08, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:44:54 -0500
From: Lawrence Teo l...@openbsd.org
Make divert_output() do an m_pullup only if truly needed.
ok?
Questionable. AFAIK m_pullup(9) will only do the pullup if it is
necesary in
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:30:21AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
may just a naive question..
but did you sudo vipw
and put unbound class for unbound user?
That's not neccesary anymore these days, I believe. The rc.d subsystem
takes case of setting the proper class, if available.
The kvm_bsd.db file only needs to be readable by programs that are
setgid kmem. This is not much of an info leak since any user can read
/bsd (or in many cases download a copy), but moving forward it would
be nice to patch these leaks up one by one.
A few kmem grovelers appear to still work
There is no warning when compiling code that calls random() but two
warnings when compiling code that calls rand() -
: warning: random() may return determinstic values, is that what you
want?warning: rand() may return determinstic values, is that what you want?
Is the first parameter to
On 2014/12/17 09:37, Carlin Bingham wrote:
There is no warning when compiling code that calls random() but two
warnings when compiling code that calls rand() -
I noticed this earlier as well.
: warning: random() may return determinstic values, is that what you
want?warning: rand() may
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 23:55, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Only in order to get a flags field that can be tweaked with config(8). And
to allow disable via config(8), though that could also be achieved with a
flag.
Tweaking the behavior with a flags
CVSROOT: /cvs
Module name: src
Changes by: s...@cvs.openbsd.org 2014/12/16 14:02:58
Modified files:
sys/arch/amd64/amd64: identcpu.c
sys/arch/amd64/include: specialreg.h
Log message:
Define and print HV cpuid flag.
This is set by many hypervisors, including kvm, vmware, hyper-v.
do they
On 16.12.2014. 6:16, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
We just got some r630s too, so I spent some time last week figuring out what's
going on here. Something in the AML wants to talk to the intel MEI device.
Normally this works, but on the new generation of dell machines (we've seen it
on r630s and
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Hrvoje Popovski hrv...@srce.hr wrote:
on R630 i have custom bios settings and noticed that even if C states are
disabled in bios i can see them in dmesg
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C1
Uh, ACPI *requires* that C1 exist. The halt instruction is defined as
entering C1, so
Hi!
The below diff extracts the memory range information from ACPI. It looks
up all the memory ranges in _CRS and calculates minimal and maximal
values for pci_machdep.c.
I tested this on two amd64 machines and see no difference in pcidump.
Do you think we need to keep the old method in case
18 matches
Mail list logo
