Some code cleanup:
- disable elf_load_phdrs() and elf_fix_phdrs() functions as there
aren't in used. I also add a comment for elf_load_phdrs(): the code
seems as buggy as elf_load_shdrs() against crafted input.
Some other code could be dead too: I have not investigated a lot in
this d
Hi,
This patch ensure that when an error is detected, the freed variables in
elf_symloadx() are reinitialised.
Else show_file() in nm.c will used these variables, even if they has
just been freed. (nm.c +689).
Problem found by afl.
--
Sébastien Marie
Index: elf.c
=
Hi,
This patch ensure that e_shentsize (sections header's size in bytes) is
big enough to fill at least one Elf_Shdr.
Please note, I am not completely sure to have understand this part:
calloc() is called with a dynamic element size (e_shentsize: readed for
file), but the variable is declared as
Sweet. I'll knockup a patch and send it upstream shortly.
Ian McWilliam
From: Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas [j...@wxcvbn.org]
Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2015 8:11 PM
To: Ian Mcwilliam
Cc: Stuart Henderson; Mark Kettenis; tech@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: samba4 slow
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:59:37PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> What about this comma.
> I saw a few manpages, having it at this location.
>
> Regards,
> --F.
>
>
> Index: merge.1
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/merge.1
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 09:57:13PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:44:07PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> > Hi tech@,
> >
> > *logins is omitted* sounds a little strange, doesn't it?
> >
>
> it does, because in your head you're thinking of logins as being the
> plur
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 09:48:23PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:33:53PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> > Hi tech@,
> >
> > isn't there a comma missing?
> >
>
> depends how you like your commas. if i were writing it, i'd have the
> comma. but many wouldn;t, and it
What about this comma.
I saw a few manpages, having it at this location.
Regards,
--F.
Index: merge.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/merge.1,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 merge.1
--- merge.1 28 Oct 2010 15:08:50
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:49:32PM +0200, Pablo Méndez Hernández wrote:
>Hi,
>
>El 18/6/2015 22:46, "Fritjof Bornebusch" escribiA^3:
>>
>> Hi tech@,
>>
>> *logins is omitted* sounds a little strange, doesn't it?
>
>"logins" as a keyword?
>
Yes, but if you read it, it
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:44:07PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> *logins is omitted* sounds a little strange, doesn't it?
>
it does, because in your head you're thinking of logins as being the
plural of login (i.e. more than one login). but you can also - correctly -
think of
Hi,
El 18/6/2015 22:46, "Fritjof Bornebusch" escribió:
>
> Hi tech@,
>
> *logins is omitted* sounds a little strange, doesn't it?
"logins" as a keyword?
Regards.
Pablo
> Regards,
> --F.
>
>
> Index: rlog.1
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/s
Joel,
yes, I will work on your recommended RAID1 with checksumming of
course. Just forgotten to add that.
Thanks,
Karel
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Joel Sing wrote:
>>
>> Re adding some form of checksumming, it only seems to make sense
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:33:53PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> isn't there a comma missing?
>
depends how you like your commas. if i were writing it, i'd have the
comma. but many wouldn;t, and it's certainly not wrong.
the reason i like that last comma is demonstrated with
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Joel Sing wrote:
>
> Re adding some form of checksumming, it only seems to make sense in the case
> of RAID 1 where you can decide that the data on a disk is invalid, then fail
> the read and pull the data from another drive. That coupled with block
> level "healin
Hi tech@,
*logins is omitted* sounds a little strange, doesn't it?
Regards,
--F.
Index: rlog.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/rlog.1,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 rlog.1
--- rlog.1 3 Sep 2010 11:09:29 -
Hi tech@,
isn't there a comma missing?
Regards,
--F.
Index: ci.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/ci.1,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -p -r1.38 ci.1
--- ci.112 Aug 2013 14:19:53 - 1.38
+++ ci.118 Jun
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:50:48PM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> If an application (say, named) is removed from base, but still included
> in ports, it it the policy to remove references to that application from
> base applications' manpages?
>
generally, yes. but in this case i'm less sure...th
If an application (say, named) is removed from base, but still included
in ports, it it the policy to remove references to that application from
base applications' manpages?
If yes, diff below.
Index: dig.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.
On 2015-06-13, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> Many thanks to all who tested, below is an updated diff with the
> missing i386 bits and "working" uaudio.
I have run into a serious problem on sparc64 (but I haven't tested
elsewhere).
I've added -L- to the sndiod flags and I'm streaming audio from a
r
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:22:31PM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote:
>
> I think Theo's proposed change is correct.
>
> ok daniel@
>
just to be clear, i'm not looking for oks for theo's patch. i am waiting
to see what happens, and then i'll decide if we need to do anything to
the docs.
as i said, i
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:56:15PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
>>
>> >From looking at the source code, I'm quite sure that the other BSD's
>> behavior is the same as the current behavior in OpenBSD.
>>
>> I agree that the formulations in the
On 06/18/15 15:18, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:56:15PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
>From looking at the source code, I'm quite sure that the other BSD's
behavior is the same as the current behavior in OpenBSD.
I agree that the formulations in the manpages and POSIX aren't e
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:53:57 +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> *edp1* and *edp2* could be used uninitialized, if *goto closem;* is called.
I don't think so. If dirp1 is non-NULL, so must edp1 be. Likewise
for dirp2 and edp2. The compiler just doesn't know that scandir()
does not modify its ou
On Wednesday 17 June 2015, Karel Gardas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm curious if anybody is working on implementing block-level
> checksumming on softraid?
Not that I'm aware of.
> Backgroud: I'm comming from Solaris 11/ZFS world and I like ZFS's
> focus on data integrity from drive level up to the RAM
The net80211 stack assumes drivers will switch IEEE80211_S_* states in
interrupt context. iwm(4) does not follow this rule. Since it insists on
responses from firmware commands to look for success or failure and it
uses tsleep() to wait for responses it cannot switch state in interrupt
context. So
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:56:15PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
>
> >From looking at the source code, I'm quite sure that the other BSD's
> behavior is the same as the current behavior in OpenBSD.
>
> I agree that the formulations in the manpages and POSIX aren't explicit,
> let alone unambiguous,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:16:08PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:33:58PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Here's a silly ed(1) session:
> >
> > $ ed -p ":> "
> > :> P
> > P
> > *q
> > $
> >
> > Notice how the prompt string changed from the custom prompt ":> " to
> > the
this adds the current signify pub key for base to the httpd Server
version header.
as you say, the keys are small. this could help distribute it widely.
here's an example of what it looks like:
dlg@mild ~$ curl -I http://es45/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Length: 2259
Content-
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:33:58PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> Here's a silly ed(1) session:
>
> $ ed -p ":> "
> :> P
> P
> *q
> $
>
> Notice how the prompt string changed from the custom prompt ":> " to
> the default prompt "*".
>
> This behavior seems to contradict both the man page and POSIX
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:25:13PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> Index: usr.bin/openssl/openssl.1
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/openssl/openssl.1,v
> retrieving revision 1.13
> diff -u -p -r1.13 openssl.1
> --- usr.bin/openssl/open
Here's a silly ed(1) session:
$ ed -p ":> "
:> P
P
*q
$
Notice how the prompt string changed from the custom prompt ":> " to
the default prompt "*".
This behavior seems to contradict both the man page and POSIX:
>From ed(1):
-p string Specifies a command prompt. This may be toggled on an
Index: usr.bin/openssl/openssl.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/openssl/openssl.1,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.13 openssl.1
--- usr.bin/openssl/openssl.1 28 Feb 2015 21:51:56 - 1.13
+++ usr.bin/openssl/openssl.1
Ian Mcwilliam writes:
> Curiously from
>
> --- samba-4.0.3/wscript Tue Dec 4 21:07:44 2012
> +++ samba-4.0.26/wscript Mon Dec 8 18:46:38 2014
>
>
> -if sys.platform != "openbsd4":
> +if not sys.platform.startswith("openbsd"):
> conf.env.asneeded_ldflags = conf.ADD_LD
33 matches
Mail list logo
