On 14/09/2015, at 11:51 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Martin Pieuchot [2015-09-11 13:54]:
>> On 11/09/15(Fri) 13:28, Henning Brauer wrote:
>>> Ryan pointed me to this diff and we briefly discussed it; we remain
>>> convinced that the in-tree approach is better than this.
>> Could you elaborate wh
With setup like:
node1: carpnodes 1:0,10:0 carpdev vmx0 balancing arp
node2: carpnodes 1:100,10:100 carped vmx0 balancing arp
(eg, I forced one machine to be a master for a while in my configs)
node2 (-current) with your diff started to pollute dmesg with:
duplicate IP address 192.168.78.123 sen
Applied.
> On 12 sep. 2015, at 19:20, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> very small first step towards MP(i) friendly PF. Patch adds mutex around
> fragment cache.
>
> Patch adds a lock around fragment cache. Unlike other parts of PF the fragment
> cache is self-contained subsystem.
This one in the tree, so it’s live on my side.
> On 14 sep. 2015, at 13:09, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> this is an attempt to make the interrupt path in vmx mpsafe.
>
> seems to hold up under load here, but more testing would be
> appreciated.
>
> Index: if_vmx.c
> ===
While I am 'paragraph' mode, here is the useful 'transpose-paragraph'
command. Comments/ok?
mark
Index: def.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/def.h,v
retrieving revision 1.148
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.148 def.h
--- def.h 24 Sep 2
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:46:12AM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote:
> Since inetd is no longer started by default and inetd.conf has been relegated
> to /etc/examples, this sentence can probably be deleted from afterboot.8.
>
> Regards,
>
fair enough. i knocked out the following Ss to avoid being left w
Michael Reed wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I test it out as both `arch' and `machine' and didn't observe
> any differences. Also, I figured I might as well convert exit(3)
> to return while touching this code, as was done in [1].
this is cleaner i think.
Index: arch.c
==
On 2015/09/13 11:15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Currently we leave RTF_STATIC route entries in the table when the
> address they are attached to is removed from a system.
>
> That's why ifas need to be refcounted and that's why we have *a lot*
> of checks in the stack to not use cached routes attach
Michael McConville wrote:
> Am I interpreting this correctly?
>
> This is the least invasive fix, but it's unfortunate that this function
> allows the supplied buffer to be NULL. If we made it unconditionally
> allocate a new buffer, we would have to change some program logic
> because uses pass s
Since inetd is no longer started by default and inetd.conf has been relegated
to /etc/examples, this sentence can probably be deleted from afterboot.8.
Regards,
Index: afterboot.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/afterboot.8,v
r
This is now needed to make sure local addresses can be used even if the
interface their are configured on is down.
ok?
Index: net/route.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/route.c,v
retrieving revision 1.242
diff -u -p -r1.242 route.c
-
11 matches
Mail list logo