> On Mar 22, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> I would not do all this work. I have indepentent targets for some
> of my own tests that I use regualry for development. But for other
> people's tests which just pass, I don't care. Making the individual
> targets independent would b
Backport a change to add "(compatible with GNU linkers)" to the lld
version output to avoid having to regenerate a large number of configure
scripts.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31199?id=
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=298532
The output is now
LLD 4.0.0 (compatible with
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:56:02PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > Do you plan to improve this situation?
>
> It depends. Do you think improving the independence of each of those
> cases is valuable in and of itself?
I would not do all this work. I have indepentent targets for some
of my own te
Hi,
apparently the "create_size" option does currently not work. This is
because the strsuftoll() function uses "long long" compares which limits
the positive maximum to LLONG_MAX. Unfortunately the maximum is always
set to ULLONG_MAX, which is treated as -1 and cannot be a reasonable
maximum va
